Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

y=3x+2 - point (r,s)

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic
Expert replies
by vishal_2804 » Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:25 am
In the xy plane, does the line with equation y=3x+2 contain the point (r,s)?

1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0
2) (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0.

Pls explain the step and the logic to solve similar type of problems.
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by Anju@Gurome » Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:54 am
vishal_2804 wrote:In the xy plane, does the line with equation y=3x+2 contain the point (r,s)?

1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0
2) (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0
If the point (r, s) is on the line y = 3x + 2, then r = 3r + 2 ---> (3r + 2 - s) = 0
So the question reduces to "Is (3r + 2 - s) = 0?"

Statement 1: (3r + 2 - s)(4r + 9 - s) = 0
So, either (3r + 2 - s) = 0 OR (4r + 9 - s) = 0

Not sufficient


Statement 2: (4r - 6 - s)(3r + 2 - s) = 0
So, either (4r - 6 - s) = 0 OR (3r + 2 - s) = 0

Not sufficient

1 & 2 Together: Either {(4r + 9 - s) = 0 and (4r - 6 - s) = 0} OR (3r + 2 - s) = 0
Now, if (4r + 9 - s) = 0 and (4r - 6 - s) = 0
--> (4r - s) = -9 and (4r - s) = 6
--> This is not possible for any values of r and s

So, (3r + 2 - s) must be equal to zero.

Sufficient

The correct answer is C.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:38 am
vishal_2804 wrote:In the xy plane, does the line with equation y=3x+2 contain the point (r,s)?

1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0
2) (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0.
If (r,s) is on the line defined by the equation y=3x+2, then (r,s) must satisfy the equation y=3x+2. In other words, it must be true that s=3r+2
For example: We know that the point (5, 17) is on the line y=3x+2, because when we plug x=5 and y=17 into the equation, we get 17 = 3(5)+2 and the equation holds true.

So, we can reword the target question to be "Does s = 3r + 2?"

1. (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s) = 0
From this, we know that either (3r+2-s) = 0 or (4r+9-s) = 0
If (3r+2-s) = 0 then s = 3r+2, in which case the answer to our new target question is yes
If (4r+9-s) = 0 then s = 4r+9, in which case the answer to our new target question is no
Since we get two different answers to the target question, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

2. (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s) = 0
From this, we know that either (4r-6-s) = 0 or (3r+2-s) = 0
If (4r-6-s)) = 0 then s = 4r-6, in which case the answer to our new target question is no
If (3r+2-s) = 0 then s = 3r+2, in which case the answer to our new target question is yes
Since we get two different answers to the target question, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1&2 combined: Since (3r+2-s) is the only expression common to both statements, it must be true that 3r+2-s = 0, in which case s MUST equal 3r+2
As such the answer is C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by srcc25anu » Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:48 am
Question is whether point (r,s) lies on RED line ?

St1: Either point (r,s) lies on RED line or GREEN line.
Not sufficient

St2: Either point (r,s) lies on RED line or BLUE line.
Not sufficient

Together: Only possible scenario is that the point lies on red line. No one point can possibly lie on both the green and blue line because they are parallel. They will never intersect each other.

Hence Point (r,s) lies on RED line.
SUFFICIENT

Ans C
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion

by jervizeloy » Sun Oct 30, 2016 6:39 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
vishal_2804 wrote:In the xy plane, does the line with equation y=3x+2 contain the point (r,s)?

1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0
2) (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0.
If (r,s) is on the line defined by the equation y=3x+2, then (r,s) must satisfy the equation y=3x+2. In other words, it must be true that s=3r+2
For example: We know that the point (5, 17) is on the line y=3x+2, because when we plug x=5 and y=17 into the equation, we get 17 = 3(5)+2 and the equation holds true.

So, we can reword the target question to be "Does s = 3r + 2?"

1. (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s) = 0
From this, we know that either (3r+2-s) = 0 or (4r+9-s) = 0
If (3r+2-s) = 0 then s = 3r+2, in which case the answer to our new target question is yes
If (4r+9-s) = 0 then s = 4r+9, in which case the answer to our new target question is no
Since we get two different answers to the target question, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

2. (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s) = 0
From this, we know that either (4r-6-s) = 0 or (3r+2-s) = 0
If (4r-6-s)) = 0 then s = 4r-6, in which case the answer to our new target question is no
If (3r+2-s) = 0 then s = 3r+2, in which case the answer to our new target question is yes
Since we get two different answers to the target question, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1&2 combined: Since (3r+2-s) is the only expression common to both statements, it must be true that 3r+2-s = 0, in which case s MUST equal 3r+2
As such the answer is C

Cheers,
Brent
Hi Brent,

Just a minor question that does not change the result but would be of great help to reinforce my concepts.

I think for each statement there are three cases to analyze. For example, for statement 1 we would have:

3r+2-s=0

OR

4r+9-s=0

OR

3r+2-s=0 AND 4r+9-s=0

Would such analysis be correct?
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:30 pm
jervizeloy wrote: Hi Brent,

Just a minor question that does not change the result but would be of great help to reinforce my concepts.

I think for each statement there are three cases to analyze. For example, for statement 1 we would have:

3r+2-s=0

OR

4r+9-s=0

OR

3r+2-s=0 AND 4r+9-s=0

Would such analysis be correct?
Yes, that's a correct analysis.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Nov 11, 2016 1:38 pm
jervizeloy wrote: I think for each statement there are three cases to analyze. For example, for statement 1 we would have:

3r+2-s=0

OR

4r+9-s=0

OR

3r+2-s=0 AND 4r+9-s=0

Would such analysis be correct?
This is true, but the cases are different in an important way. The first two give you r in terms and s, and the last one gives you the exact values of r and s. So depending on the prompt, the first two might be sufficient, or you might need the third case.
Join the discussion