BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

xyz

Expert replies
by shibal » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:22 pm
On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?
a. xyz < 0
b. xy < 0

i get c oa is e
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Robinmrtha » Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:28 pm
On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?
a. xyz < 0
b. xy < 0

xyz < 0
This means that one either one of x, y or z is negative or all are negative...
so when z is negative and x and y are positive...it doesn't lie betn x and y
and if all of them are negative z may or may not lie in between x and y
Insufficient

xy < 0
so either x or y is negative...
but doesnt say anything about z...
Insufficient

Combining both we get
if x is negative...
then z is at the right of x but its not known if its really at the right or left of y
similarly when y is negative...we cant determine the position of z
Hence E is the answer
Join the discussion

Re: xyz

by avigmat11 » Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:12 am
shibal wrote:On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?
a. xyz < 0
b. xy < 0

i get c oa is e
---------------
OA should be E as even combining a and b, we are not able to tell the postion of Z.
Thanks
Join the discussion

by benissleeping » Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:56 am
What would you guys suggest as the quickest way of solving such problems with the number line?

I tend to draw different combinations on the number line & actively think of situations which prove insufficient. Is there a quicker way?
Join the discussion

by wetandfire » Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:28 am
For this particular problem the issue is that we are trying to find distance and without any hard numbers, only positive or negative, they are trying to trick you into thinking that if X and Z are both positive or both negative they are closer than if Y is the opposite. This isn't always going to be true either way since if X = 1, if Y is -1, it will still be closer than if Z = 5.
Join the discussion