BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

xyz

Expert replies
by shibal » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:22 pm
On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?
a. xyz < 0
b. xy < 0

i get c oa is e
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Robinmrtha » Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:28 pm
On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?
a. xyz < 0
b. xy < 0

xyz < 0
This means that one either one of x, y or z is negative or all are negative...
so when z is negative and x and y are positive...it doesn't lie betn x and y
and if all of them are negative z may or may not lie in between x and y
Insufficient

xy < 0
so either x or y is negative...
but doesnt say anything about z...
Insufficient

Combining both we get
if x is negative...
then z is at the right of x but its not known if its really at the right or left of y
similarly when y is negative...we cant determine the position of z
Hence E is the answer
Join the discussion

Re: xyz

by avigmat11 » Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:12 am
shibal wrote:On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?
a. xyz < 0
b. xy < 0

i get c oa is e
---------------
OA should be E as even combining a and b, we are not able to tell the postion of Z.
Thanks
Join the discussion

by benissleeping » Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:56 am
What would you guys suggest as the quickest way of solving such problems with the number line?

I tend to draw different combinations on the number line & actively think of situations which prove insufficient. Is there a quicker way?
Join the discussion

by wetandfire » Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:28 am
For this particular problem the issue is that we are trying to find distance and without any hard numbers, only positive or negative, they are trying to trick you into thinking that if X and Z are both positive or both negative they are closer than if Y is the opposite. This isn't always going to be true either way since if X = 1, if Y is -1, it will still be closer than if Z = 5.
Join the discussion