BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

XYZ

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by niketdoshi123 » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:16 pm
grandh01 wrote:If x, y, and z are three integers, are
they consecutive integers?
(1) z - x = 2
(2) x < y < z

OA is C
grandh01 wrote:If x, y, and z are three integers, are
they consecutive integers?
(1) z - x = 2
(2) x < y < z

OA is C

statement 1:
z-x = 2
we don't know anything about y
let z = 4
since z - x = 2 , x = 2
y can be 5 , in which case 2,4 & 5 are not consecutive integers. NO
y can be 3 , in which case 2,3 & 4 are consecutive integers. YES

Hence the statement is insufficient

Statement 2:

x<y<z
2<4<6 Not consecutive integers but satisfy the equation. NO
2<3<4 Consecutive integers and satisfy the equation. YES

Hence the statement is insufficient

Combining both the statement

Since x,y&z are integers , z - x = 2 and x<y<z
therefore z - y (must be) = 1 to satisfy all the above conditions.

Hence x, y & z are consecutive integers.
Sufficient

The correct answer is C
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:40 pm
grandh01 wrote:If x, y, and z are three integers, are
they consecutive integers?
(1) z - x = 2
(2) x < y < z

OA is C
(1) z - x = 2 or z = x + 2
So, 3 integers are x, y, and x + 2, but we do not know the relation between x and y. So, it is difficult to answer whether x, y, and z are consecutive integers; NOT sufficient.

(2) x < y < z
There are many possibilities that satisfy this condition, viz., 2, 4, 6 (here the 3 integers are consecutive), OR, 1, 10, 40 (here the 3 integers are not consecutive).
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), we get, x < y < x + 2
It is given that x, y, and z are integers, so the only possibility is that the 3 integers are: x , x + 1, x + 2.
Hence the 3 integers are consecutive; SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by alex.gellatly » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:48 pm
grandh01 wrote:If x, y, and z are three integers, are
they consecutive integers?
(1) z - x = 2
(2) x < y < z
Statement 1 is insufficient because it tells us nothing about y

Statement 2 is insufficient because z, y, and z could take on any values to satisfy the conditions.

Together it is a little tricky. One might want to say together they are still both insufficient. However, if you start plugging in values to satisfy the conditions you will quickly find that they are indeed consecutive. For example;

Take any number for z... say 4

(From 1) z=x+2, so x = 2. There is only 1 integer in between for y (3) to satisfy statement 2.

Another example say z = 10, so x=8... again only one integer in between for y (9)

Does this help? In my opinion its always a good idea to plug in values and see where you again. The GMAT loves to trick us!
A useful website I found that has every quant OG video explanation:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/useful-websi ... tml#475231
Join the discussion

Re: XYZ

by Scott@TargetTestPrep » Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:16 am
grandh01 wrote:
Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:00 pm
If x, y, and z are three integers, are
they consecutive integers?
(1) z - x = 2
(2) x < y < z

OA is C
Solution:

Question Stem Analysis:

We need to determine whether x, y, and z are consecutive integers.

Statement One Alone:

Since we don’t know anything about y, statement one alone is sufficient.

Statement Two Alone:

Even though we know the order of the three integers, we can’t determine whether x, y, and z are consecutive integers. Statement two alone is not sufficient.

Statements One and Two Together:

Since z - x = 2 and x < y < z, y = x +1 and z = x + 2. This makes the three integers consecutive integers. Both statements together are sufficient.

Answer: C

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion