BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

xy ds prob

Expert replies
by tj123 » Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:03 pm
Are x and y both positive?
1) 2x-2y = 1
2) (x/y) > 1

I chose E.
Answer is c

I did the following:
2(x-y)=1
x-y=1/2

Even with x>y, its still insufficient in my opinion since it could be :
1-.5 = 1/2
or even
.25- (-.25) = 1/2

Please explain
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gaggleofgirls » Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Here's what I get:

2 is easier, so x/y >1 so x and y must both be pos or both be neg, so insuficient.

1)
2x-2y = 1
2(x-y)=1
x-y = 1/2
You can come up with examples here of x,y both pos; y,x both ned and pos/neg or neg/pos, so it doesn't help us with sign at all on it's own, therefore insuff.

Together, they are still insuff in that we don't know any more together than we did in just 1).

So, I believe the Answer is E

-Carrie
Join the discussion

by Zipper » Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:45 pm
We do get more info for both.

x>y and they are both the same sign

so

x-y=1/2

x and y can't both be negative so they are both positive.
and we can't have +x -y or -x +y anymore coz they must be the same sign.

Hence, C
Join the discussion

by aroon7 » Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:01 pm
from 1 we have x-y = 1/2

we have 3 possibilities for X and Y with respect to their signs :
+ -
+ +
- -

x = 1/4;y = -1/4; x-y = 1/2
x = 1;y = 1/2; x-y = 1/2
x = -1;y = -3/2;x-y = 1/2

so (1) is insuff

2) says x/y >1
we can know both X and Y have same sign
Insuff

combining both,

only X = +ve and Y = +ve will satisfy the condition
in the above examples, (-1)/(-3/2) yields answer less than 1, while (1)/(1/2) is greater than 1

So C
Last edited by aroon7 on Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Join the discussion

by gaggleofgirls » Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:03 pm
Whey can't x and y both be negative?

x=-1/4
y = -3/4
-1/4 - -3/4 = 1/2

-Carrie
Join the discussion

by aroon7 » Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:07 pm
gaggleofgirls wrote:Whey can't x and y both be negative?

x=-1/4
y = -3/4
-1/4 - -3/4 = 1/2

-Carrie
I missed it carrie. thanks!
still (-1/4)/(-3/4) is less than 1.
still C :)

Edited: i didn miss it. it the third row in my example...
Join the discussion

by gaggleofgirls » Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:18 pm
Arron - It was Zipper who said that they can't both be negative.

But I do see my mistake. I didn't pull enough information from 2)
Not only must x,y be both pos or both neg, but x>y (if it had been x/y >0, then the answer would be E).

With x,y both pos or both neg AND x > y, then the only way to solve for 1) x-y = 1/2 is for them both to be positive becuase there is no way for a neg number less than another negative number to also be greater than it.

so, yes, the answer is C.

-Carrie
Join the discussion

by tj123 » Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:04 pm
what about these options:

let x = 1
and y = .5


1-.5 = .5

x and y are both positive and its sufficient to answer the question.
HOWEVER now

let x = .25
and y = -.25

.25- (-.25)= .5

x and y are not both positive but it satisfies statement 2 with x>y

The answer should be E
Join the discussion

by Alara533 » Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:53 am
tj123 there is a small correction here.

x/y > 1 means |x| > |y| and not exactly x > y.

From first equation we have y = x - (1/2)
so different values of (x,y) can be (1, 1/2), (1/2,0), (1/4,-1/4), (0,-1/2), (-1/4, -3/4). Here we have both positive x,y values, both negative x,y values and mixed x,y values. Hence in sufficient.

From second we have |x| > |y|. Which is insufficient.

Together, we have

y = x - (1/2) and |x| > |y|

Now from y = x - 1/2, for any -ve value of x, we will get a -ve value of y such that |x| < |y|.

Hence for |x| to be greater than |y| and satisfy y = x - 1/2, x and y should be positive.

Answer C
Join the discussion