BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

(x-y)/ (x+y) < 1

Expert replies
by gkumar » Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 am
I couldn't find this problem in the search results. I am confused by the below GPrep question:
If x is not equal to y, is (x-y)/ (x+y) < 1?
1) x>0
2) y<0

I rephrased the question to be the following:
Case 1: x+y>0
Cross multiply to get: x-y < x+y
-y < y
0 < 2y
0 < y

Case 2: x-y<0
Cross multiply and switch inequality sign: x-y > x+y
-y > y
0 > 2y
0 > y

So the rephrased question is asking: "Is y>0 or y<0?"

Looking at (1), X is not involved in the rephrase that contains only y, so it is irrelevant and hence insufficient.

Looking at (2), y<0 is given and answers the rephrased question of "is y<0" and the answer is yes. So I assumed B.

[spoiler]But the official answer is E. I realize that I could plug in numbers to get this answer, but isn't that time consuming? Why did my approach not work?[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by xcusemeplz2009 » Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:36 am
IMO E is the correct ans

as it is not given that x and y are int.

in fractional value and whole no we get diff results even on combining bth.
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion

by Talkativetree » Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:19 pm
If x and y were integers, I believe the answer would be b, but x and y could also be fractions, so that would chance the answer to insufficient, because we could end up with a fraction over a fraction, which could potentially be greater than 0.

I thought it was B at first as well, then remembered that.
Join the discussion

by grockit_jake » Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:56 am
The reason cross multiplying doesn't work is if you multiply an inequality by a negative number, then the sign switches. So if you don't know whether (x+y) is positive or negative, then you can't know the direction of the inequality, which is obviously very important.

While the signs of x and are clearly important in this and other questions like it, the key here is recognizing that the absolute values of x and y are not given. So if x and y are opposite signs, we don't know if their sum is +/-/0 since that depends on their magnitude.
Jake Becker
Academic Director
Grockit Test Prep
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by panda8989 » Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:45 pm
I think your approach has an error in these steps

Case 1: x+y>0
Cross multiply to get: x-y < x+y
-y < y
0 < 2y <----- this should be -1 < 1 or -1 > 1 depending on the sign of y
0 < y

Case 2: x-y<0
Cross multiply and switch inequality sign: x-y > x+y
-y > y
0 > 2y <----- same as in case (1)
0 > y

When I try to solve these types of questions, I check to see if the inequality sign will change when you cross multiply...

(x-y)/(y+x) < 1

(x-y) < (y+x) if (y+x) > 0
(x-y) > (y+x) if (y+x) < 0

even if both (1) and (2) are true, it cannot determine the sign of (y+x) since we don't know if |x| > |y| or |x| < |y|.

Not sure if this is a valid approach.. but that's how I got to (E)... Hope it helps!
Join the discussion

by agganitk » Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:16 am
Can some one explain to me where I am wrong?

if X+Y >0 ==> X> -Y
THEN
X-Y > X + Y
Y<0
bcoz X>-Y ==> X>0
hence for [X>0, Y<0] (X-Y)/(X+Y)>1 [CASE 1]
-------------------------------------------
if X+Y <0 ==> X< -Y
THEN
X-Y < X + Y
Y>0
bcoz X<-Y ==> X<0
hence for [X<0,Y>0] (X-Y)/(X+Y)>1 [CASE 2]

-----------------------------------------------

statement 1 and 2 tell us X>0 and Y <0
therefore using case one, we can say (X-Y)/(X+Y) >1


ANS SHOULD BE C. BUT OA IS E

?????????????????
Join the discussion

by Asif » Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:12 am
Answer is E.

x = 1, Y = -1

solve for (x-y)/(x+y)= 2/0 which is undefined, so the answer is E.

Singly both the statements are not sufficient as well.
Join the discussion