BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

x>y

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 2:28 am

Re: x>y

by greymatter » Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:05 pm
ketkoag wrote:is x>y?
1) x^.5 > y
2) x^3 > y

[spoiler]please confirm the answer.. my answer C yes x>y.[/spoiler]
cosider x=2 and y =3

2^5>3

and

2^3>3

combining

2^2>3

so is x>y NO

now consider

x=3 and y =2

3^5>2
3^3>2

and
3^2>2

so is x>y Yes

hence answer should be E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 179
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:41 am
Thanked: 2 times

by abhinav85 » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:41 am
i think IMO A

Becoz statement 1 says that x^.5 > y?

that means x^1/2 > y

= square root x > y!!!! sufficient.

statement 2 is insufficient.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 472
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:54 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by ssmiles08 » Sat Jun 20, 2009 6:04 am
I got (E) as my answer.

1) x^(1/2) > y

values to test case 1.

(1/4,0) (1/4,1/4)

a. (1/4)^(1/2) > 0;
1/4 > 0 : TRUE.

b. (1/4)^(1/2) > 1/4;
1/4 > 1/4 : FALSE.

INSUFFICIENT.


2) x^3 > y

values to test case 2. (1,0) (-1/4, -1/4)

a. 1^3 > 0
1 > 0: TRUE

b. (-1/4)^3 > (1/4) = -1/64 > -1/4
(-1/4) > (-1/4): FALSE.

Together, the values of x are restricted to be positive because of case 1.

Making all x positive would result in the same scenario as case 1, which would provide contradicting values.

So i will go with (E)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 10:38 pm
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:700

by rah_pandey » Sat Jun 20, 2009 6:18 am
Ketkoag,
have you written the entire question? does it comment on possible values x,y can take say x>0,y>0

because root(x)=> x>0
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 8:41 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by ankit1383 » Sat Jun 20, 2009 6:48 pm
ssmiles08 wrote:
1) x^(1/2) > y

values to test case 1.

(1/4,0) (1/4,1/4)

a. (1/4)^(1/2) > 0;
1/4 > 0 : TRUE.

b. (1/4)^(1/2) > 1/4;
1/4 > 1/4 : FALSE.

INSUFFICIENT.

Making all x positive would result in the same scenario as case 1, which would provide contradicting values.
i am still getting my answer as C......ssmiles08 can you elaborate on the bold part...........
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 472
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:54 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by ssmiles08 » Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:11 am
ankit1383 wrote:
ssmiles08 wrote:
1) x^(1/2) > y

values to test case 1.

(1/4,0) (1/4,1/4)

a. (1/4)^(1/2) > 0;
1/4 > 0 : TRUE.

b. (1/4)^(1/2) > 1/4;
1/4 > 1/4 : FALSE.

INSUFFICIENT.

Making all x positive would result in the same scenario as case 1, which would provide contradicting values.
i am still getting my answer as C......ssmiles08 can you elaborate on the bold part...........
ankit1383,

Thank you very much for catching my error. You are right. I am getting C as well. I realized that I did not fully test case 2 values on both case 1 and 2.

x has to be positive for both scenarios to work, sqrrt(x) >y and x^3 > y. x will always be > than y. Examples can be (1/4,0) (5,3) and so on.

I will go with C then.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 amFollowed by: 355 members
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
GMAT Score:780

Re: x>y

by Ian Stewart » Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:07 pm
ketkoag wrote:is x>y?
1) x^.5 > y
2) x^3 > y

[spoiler]please confirm the answer.. my answer C yes x>y.[/spoiler]
We can assume that x is not negative; if x were negative, Statement 1 wouldn't make sense. Now:

S1 is insufficient. x could be 1/4, and y could be 1/3, for example, so x might be less than y. x could also be greater than y.

S2 is insufficient. x could be 2, and y could be 3, for example, so x might be less than y. x could also be greater than y.

S1+S2 together:

If 0 < x < 1, then x^3 < x < x^0.5. So in this case, since S2 is true, then y < x^3 < x < x^0.5, and in particular, y < x.

If 1 < x, then x^0.5 < x < x^3. So in this case, since S1 is true, y < x^0.5 < x < x^3, and in particular, y < x.

So together the statements are sufficient. C.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1