BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

x and y consecutive perfect squares

Expert replies
by abhi332 » Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:34 pm
If x, y, and z are positive integers, where x > y and z=x^(1/2) , are x and y consecutive perfect squares? (A perfect
square is defined as the square of an integer. For example, 36 is a perfect square since it equals 6 squared, while
38 is not a perfect square since it is not equal to the square of any integer.)
(1) x + y = 8z +1
(2) x - y = 2z - 1

[spoiler]OA:B[/spoiler]
What you think, you become.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vineetbatra » Thu Feb 25, 2010 5:55 pm
Can solve B using Plugging numbers, but have no clue on A.

Anyone?
Join the discussion

by hrishi19884 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:16 am
consider (2)

The rule is that - difference between any two consecutive perfect squares is equal to 2z - 1 when z =sqrt(x) and x>y

ex : x= 16 and Y = 9 ,so z will be naturally 4

x-y =16 -9 = 7

2z - 1 = 4*2 - 1 = 7

ex : x= 25 and Y = 16, so z will be 5

x-y =25 -16 = 9

2z - 1 = 5*2 - 1 = 9

Incase x,y are not consecutive - say x=16 and y=4, z=sqrt(x)=4

x-y =16 -4 = 12

2z - 1 = 4*2 - 1 = 7

Not equal, so x,y should be consecutive.

So B is sufficient

If we consider (1)

x + y = 16 + 9 =25

8z +1 = 4*8 + 1 = 33

not equal - hence (1)not sufficient

Ans = B
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion

by Fiver » Sat Feb 27, 2010 6:33 am
abhi332 wrote:If x, y, and z are positive integers, where x > y and z=x^(1/2) , are x and y consecutive perfect squares? (A perfect
square is defined as the square of an integer. For example, 36 is a perfect square since it equals 6 squared, while
38 is not a perfect square since it is not equal to the square of any integer.)
(1) x + y = 8z +1
(2) x - y = 2z - 1

[spoiler]OA:B[/spoiler]
When z = root (x)
and x > y

is root (y) + 1 = root (x)?
or is root (y) = root (x) - 1?
or is root (y) = z - 1 ?

A] x + y = 8z +1

Try replacing 'x' with z^2; it doesn't take us anywhere.
Insufficient.

B] x - y = 2z - 1
z^2 - y = 2z - 1
z^2 - 2z + 1 = y
(z - 1)^2 = y
Since given all are positive
(z - 1) = root (y)

And this is what we are looking for.
Hence B.
Join the discussion

by vertigo05 » Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:28 pm
But, if we put values in (A), we get that x and y are not consecutive perfect squares. So (A) should also be sufficient. Pls let me know where i'm wrong.
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:18 pm
vertigo05 wrote:But, if we put values in (A), we get that x and y are not consecutive perfect squares. So (A) should also be sufficient. Pls let me know where i'm wrong.
a) X+Y=8Z+1

NOW IF x=16 and y=9 rhs=25 and lhs=33#rhs--------> x and y are not a perfect square

but if x=9 and y=16---->RHS=25 and LHS=25=RHS---------> x and y are perfect square

as bth the cases are possible so its inconclusive
Join the discussion

by kstv » Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:42 pm
If z = a , x = a², y = (a-1)² x and y are consecutive perrfect square
x+y = a²+(a²-2a+1)= 2a²-2a+1 = 8z+1
2a(a-1)= 8a or (a-1)= 4
so A is true only when a = 5
Join the discussion

by schumi_gmat » Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:16 am
IMO E

HEre is my solution -

Here is my solution -



x y z (i) (ii) ANS

25 16 5 Y Y

25 4 5 N N

36 25 6 N Y

Can anyone throw more light??
Join the discussion

by pharmxanthan » Fri Apr 30, 2010 5:22 pm
thephoenix wrote:
vertigo05 wrote:But, if we put values in (A), we get that x and y are not consecutive perfect squares. So (A) should also be sufficient. Pls let me know where i'm wrong.
a) X+Y=8Z+1

NOW IF x=16 and y=9 rhs=25 and lhs=33#rhs--------> x and y are not a perfect square

but if x=9 and y=16---->RHS=25 and LHS=25=RHS---------> x and y are perfect square

as bth the cases are possible so its inconclusive
If x=9 and y=16 then x is less than y. But in question stem, x should be more than y.
Statement A is conclusive and so is statement B. But statements A and B give different answers, i.e, per Statement A, x and y are not consecutive perfect squares, while per Statement B, x and y are! So, should answer be "E"?

Confusing!
Join the discussion