BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

www.mba.com - CR

Expert replies
by h_jitendras » Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:24 pm
Radio stations with radio data system (RDS) technology broadcast special program information that only radios with an RDS feature can receive. Between 1994 and 1996, the number of RDS radio stations in Verdland increased from 250 to 600. However, since the number of RDS-equipped radios in Verdland was about the same in 1996 as in 1994, the number of Verdlanders receiving the special program information probably did not increase significantly.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

1)In 1996 most Verdlanders who lived within the listening area of an RDS station already had a radio equipped to receive RDS.
2)Equipping a radio station with RDS technology does not decrease the station's listening area.
3)Few if any of the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994 broadcast to people with RDS-equipped radios living in areas not previously reached by RDS stations.
4)In 1996 Verdlanders who did not own radios equipped to receive RDS could not receive any programming from the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994.
5)The RDS radio stations in Verdland in 1996 did not all offer the same type of programming.

OA after some brain-storming....
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by kvcpk » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:14 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

by h_jitendras » Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:41 am
Can you please explain your line of reasoning here?

kvcpk wrote:IMO C
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:24 am
If someone doesn't receive the special program information, it may be because he lacks a specially-equipped radio or because he lives somewhere not within the range of stations broadcasting this information. Thus C must be true for the conclusion of the argument to be valid: if lots of people had these special radios but live in areas only recently served by a RDS station, it is quite likely that the number of people receiving RDS has increased significantly
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by h_jitendras » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:46 am
OA is C
I couldnt quite understand what is wrong with option (A) or for that matter with option (B)?

kevincanspain wrote:If someone doesn't receive the special program information, it may be because he lacks a specially-equipped radio or because he lives somewhere not within the range of stations broadcasting this information. Thus C must be true for the conclusion of the argument to be valid: if lots of people had these special radios but live in areas only recently served by a RDS station, it is quite likely that the number of people receiving RDS has increased significantly
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:44 pm
To receive the special information, you need an RDS station and an RDS radio. The passage argues that because the # of RDS radios is the same, the number of people receiving the info has not increased even though there are many more RDS stations.

This assumes everyone who had RDS radios in '94 was actually receiving RDS data. It could well be that although some people had RDS radios, they did not receive the data because there were no RDS station serving their area. If this were the case, now that there are new RDS stations, the number of people receiving the data will increase even though there are no new RDS radios.

(3) is correct because it points to this assumption: the new RDS stations do not cover previously under-served areas. If we negate this assumption and say that the new RDS station are broadcasting to people who have had RDS radios for a while but had no RDS coverage, it would destroy the argument that the # of people receiving RDS has not increase.

Negating the (3) damages the argument, so (3) is the assumption (the correct answer)

More detailed analysis of each answer can be found at GMATPrep Question 2380. To practice similar questions in timed drills, set the Drill Generator to topic='CR Assumptions' and difficulty='700+'

Hope that helped,
-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion