BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

WORK

Expert replies
by heshamelaziry » Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:48 pm
Two carpenters, Antoine and Ben, built identical picture frames at different constant rates. Antoine, working alone for 7 hours, built some of the picture frames in a given shipment; then Ben, working alone for 6 hours, built the rest of the picture frames in the shipment. How many hours would it have taken Antoine, working alone, to build all of the picture frames in the shipment?

1. Antoine built one picture frame every 15 minutes.

2. Antoine built four times as many picture frames in 7 hours as Ben built in 6 hours


OA B
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: WORK

by Testluv » Sat Nov 14, 2009 7:34 pm
heshamelaziry wrote:Two carpenters, Antoine and Ben, built identical picture frames at different constant rates. Antoine, working alone for 7 hours, built some of the picture frames in a given shipment; then Ben, working alone for 6 hours, built the rest of the picture frames in the shipment. How many hours would it have taken Antoine, working alone, to build all of the picture frames in the shipment?

1. Antoine built one picture frame every 15 minutes.

2. Antoine built four times as many picture frames in 7 hours as Ben built in 6 hours


OA B
So, the question tells us that Antoine built "some" in 7 hours, and then B built the rest of them in 6 hours.

Statement One:

Antoine built one picture frame every 15 minutes.

But without knowing how many picture frames there are, this info is not helpful. Insufficient.

Statement Two:

So, Antoine does four out of five parts of the whole job in 7 hours. This info will allow us to compute how long it would take Antoine do the whole job. Sufficient.

Choose B.

Note that because this is data sufficiency we wouldn't actually perform the math in analyzing statement two; instead, we would realize that we COULD perform it.

Here is the work we would not have had to do:

Because Antoine does 4/5 of the job in 7 hours, it will take Antoine 7* (5/4) = 35/4 or 8 and 3/4 hours to complete the whole job working alone.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion