BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Work Rate problem

Expert replies
by gdshamain » Tue May 13, 2014 9:26 am
Machines X and Y work at their constant rates. How many more hours does it take Y working alone to fill an order than it takes X, working alone.

A) X and Y working together fill an order of size in 2/3rd time that machine X, working alone does

B) Y, working alone, fills an order in twice the time that X working alone, does
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATinsight » Tue May 13, 2014 10:43 am
Image
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Tue May 13, 2014 12:58 pm
Let's have X's rate be 1/x per hour and Y's rate be 1/y per hour, so that X takes x hours and Y takes y hours, respectively, to complete the job.

S1 gives us a relationship between the two rates, but nothing about the actual HOURS each machine takes. (For instance, X and Y together could take 2 hours and X could take 3 hours, or X and Y together could take 20 hours and X could take 30 hours.) INSUFFICIENT

S2 doesn't help either: Y could take 10 hours and X 5 hours, or Y could take 12 hours and X 6 hours, etc.

Combining the two statements still doesn't help, as they say the same thing. We can demonstrate this algebraically as follows:

S1 gives us

(1/x + 1/y) = 3/2 * (1/x)
or
(x+y)/xy = 3/2x
or
(x+y) = 3y/2
or
2x = y

But S1 also tells us that y = 2x, so we haven't got enough equations to solve the problem. Thus the two statements together are INSUFFICIENT, and the answer is E.
Join the discussion

by gdshamain » Tue May 13, 2014 1:09 pm
Thank you, it is clear now!
Join the discussion

by unknown13 » Tue May 13, 2014 8:02 pm
Thanks for explanation
I got the same answer but the problem i made is that
y=2x I assume that this will give me answer if i know any 1 variable. but actual exam they are expecting the tangible value (hard number) and not the equation

thanks again
Join the discussion