BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

work and rate

Expert replies
by maihuna » Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:54 am
A piece of work was done by A, B, C; at first A worked alone but after some days was joined by B, and these two after some days were joined by C. The whole work might have been done by B and C if they had each worked twice the number of of days that they actually did. The whole work could also have been completed without B's help if A had worked two thirds and C four times the number of days they actually did; or if A and B had worked together for 40 days without C; or if all together if had worked together for the time that B had worked. The number of days that elapsed before B began to work was to the number that elapsed before B began to work as 3 to 5; find the number of days that A worked.

A:30
B:35
C:45
D:57
E:65
Last edited by maihuna on Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:39 am, edited 2 times in total.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

Re: work and rate

by doclkk » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:15 pm
maihuna wrote:A piece of work was done by A, B, C; at first A worked alone but after some days was joined by B, and these two after some days were joined by C. The whole work might have been done by B and C if they had each worked twice the number of of days that they actually did. The whole work could also have been completed without B's help if A had worked two thirds and C four times the number of days they actually did; or if A and B had worked together for 40 days without C; or if all together if had worked together for the time that B had worked. The number of days that elapsed before B began to work was to the number that elapsed before B began to work as 3 to 5; find the number of days that each men worked.

A:67 B:76 C: 6
A:86 B:52 C: 8
A:45 B:24 C: 10
A:56 B:42 C: 18
A:45 B:34 C: 24
Where did you get this problem?
Join the discussion

Re: work and rate

by maihuna » Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:37 am
doclkk wrote:
maihuna wrote: Where did you get this problem?
Why? Does it matter? Do you think it is an absurd question?
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by cholloway » Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:24 am
it is not written very well...
Join the discussion

by vpmba2009 » Thu Jun 04, 2009 8:55 am
I think this is not a GMAT problem.
Join the discussion

by mbadrew » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:24 am
You'll never find a confusing and senseless problem like this in the OG; even in the 700 range of difficulty.
Join the discussion

Re: work and rate

by doclkk » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:03 am
maihuna wrote:
doclkk wrote:
maihuna wrote: Where did you get this problem?
Why? Does it matter? Do you think it is an absurd question?
I asked where because as you can see - most of us think that we will never see this question or anything like it on the GMAT.
Join the discussion