Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

work and rate

Expert replies
by maihuna » Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:54 am
A piece of work was done by A, B, C; at first A worked alone but after some days was joined by B, and these two after some days were joined by C. The whole work might have been done by B and C if they had each worked twice the number of of days that they actually did. The whole work could also have been completed without B's help if A had worked two thirds and C four times the number of days they actually did; or if A and B had worked together for 40 days without C; or if all together if had worked together for the time that B had worked. The number of days that elapsed before B began to work was to the number that elapsed before B began to work as 3 to 5; find the number of days that A worked.

A:30
B:35
C:45
D:57
E:65
Last edited by maihuna on Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:39 am, edited 2 times in total.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

Re: work and rate

by doclkk » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:15 pm
maihuna wrote:A piece of work was done by A, B, C; at first A worked alone but after some days was joined by B, and these two after some days were joined by C. The whole work might have been done by B and C if they had each worked twice the number of of days that they actually did. The whole work could also have been completed without B's help if A had worked two thirds and C four times the number of days they actually did; or if A and B had worked together for 40 days without C; or if all together if had worked together for the time that B had worked. The number of days that elapsed before B began to work was to the number that elapsed before B began to work as 3 to 5; find the number of days that each men worked.

A:67 B:76 C: 6
A:86 B:52 C: 8
A:45 B:24 C: 10
A:56 B:42 C: 18
A:45 B:34 C: 24
Where did you get this problem?
Join the discussion

Re: work and rate

by maihuna » Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:37 am
doclkk wrote:
maihuna wrote: Where did you get this problem?
Why? Does it matter? Do you think it is an absurd question?
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by cholloway » Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:24 am
it is not written very well...
Join the discussion

by vpmba2009 » Thu Jun 04, 2009 8:55 am
I think this is not a GMAT problem.
Join the discussion

by mbadrew » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:24 am
You'll never find a confusing and senseless problem like this in the OG; even in the 700 range of difficulty.
Join the discussion

Re: work and rate

by doclkk » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:03 am
maihuna wrote:
doclkk wrote:
maihuna wrote: Where did you get this problem?
Why? Does it matter? Do you think it is an absurd question?
I asked where because as you can see - most of us think that we will never see this question or anything like it on the GMAT.
Join the discussion