Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Work and Rate Problems

Expert replies
by swerve » Wed Nov 04, 2026 10:12 am
Timer
00:00
Your answer
Difficulty–

right wrong

Pick an answer to see how members did

Stark and Roggers are both baking pies. Stark can make \(M\) pies per hour; Roggers can make \(J\) pies per hour. Stark begins baking pies alone, but later Roggers joins him. If \(100\) pies are finished \(x\) hours after Roggers joins Stark, how many pies has Stark already made by the time Roggers begins to help?

1. Working together Stark and Roggers can bake \(25\) pies per hour

2. Once Roggers arrives, Stark and Roggers complete the remainder of the pies in \(2\) hours

The OA is C
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Work and Rate Problems

by BTG Expert Team » Thu Nov 05, 2026 3:22 pm
What we see: a work-rate Data Sufficiency question. Stark bakes alone, then Roggers joins, and 100 pies are done \(x\) hours later. We want how many pies Stark made before Roggers arrived.

Step 1. Shrink the question to what we really need.
What we see: after Roggers joins, they bake together for \(x\) hours at \(M + J\) pies per hour.
What it means: pies made together \(= (M + J) \times x\). Everything else of the 100 was baked by Stark alone, so Stark's early pies \(= 100 - (M + J)x\).
What we do and why: we do not need \(M\) or \(J\) on its own. We only need the product \((M + J) \times x\). Knowing that is enough.

Step 2. Statement (1): together they bake 25 pies per hour.
What we see: \(M + J = 25\).
What it means: we still do not know \(x\). If \(x = 1\), Stark made \(100 - 25 = 75\) early. If \(x = 2\), Stark made \(100 - 50 = 50\).
What we do and why: two different answers, so it is not sufficient.

Step 3. Statement (2): they finish together in 2 hours.
What we see: \(x = 2\).
What it means: we still do not know their combined speed. At 10 pies per hour, Stark made 80 early; at 30 pies per hour, Stark made 40.
What we do and why: two different answers, so it is not sufficient.

Step 4. Use both statements together.
What we see: \(M + J = 25\) and \(x = 2\).
What it means: they baked \(25 \times 2 = 50\) pies together, so Stark made \(100 - 50 = 50\) pies before Roggers came.
What we do and why: one value, so together they are sufficient.

The trap: E, because we never learn \(M\) or \(J\) alone. We do not need them: after Roggers joins, only the combined speed matters.
Takeaway: in Data Sufficiency, rewrite the question as the smallest thing you need (here, \((M + J) \times x\)). A sum or a product can be enough even when its parts stay unknown.

Answer: C
Join the discussion