BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

word problem

Expert replies
by naaga » Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:21 am
A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would give a profit to the dealer of 40 percent of the original cost. What was the original cost of the bracelet?
(1) After reducing this asking price by 10 percent, the jewelry dealer sold the bracelet at a profit of $403.
(2) The jewelry dealer sold the bracelet for $1,953.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DanaJ » Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:43 am
Say AP = asking price
OC = original cost
You have that AP = 40%*OC + 100%*OC = 140%OC

1 tells us that AP - 10%*AP = OC + 403. This means that 0.9 (or 90%) of AP = OC + 403. Use this equation and the one above to make a system of two equations with two unknown factors, which could be easily solved:
AP = 1.4OC
0.9AP = OC + 403
So 1 is sufficient.

2 is not sufficient since we do not know if the dealer sold the bracelet for the asking price or if he had to reduce it.

So I'd go with B
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:15 pm
1) Lets say x is the original price. So 0.4x should be the initial profit expected.

Asking price would be x+0.4x.
Now the dealer decides to give 10% discount on the asking price, so the new asking price would be 0.9(x+0.4x).

Now, (the new discounted asking price) - (the original price) is the profit the dealer gained by selling this bracelet. The profit he gained is $403. So..

(0.9(x+0.4x)) - x = 403

You can solve this equation and find out the value of x, which is the original price. So (1) is sufficient.

2) is insufficient since we do not know whether any discount was given on the asking price.

So I'd go with A.

@Dana: Shouldn't the answer be A since you followed the same logic like i did?
Join the discussion

by x2suresh » Thu Feb 12, 2009 1:30 pm
agree with jadeja.
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:11 pm
Sorry guys... Of course it's A, I just missed the correct letter...
Join the discussion

thanks

by naaga » Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:30 am
thankyou Danaj and jadeja.....very clear explanation
Join the discussion