Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Wood

Expert replies
by imskpwr » Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:55 am
Brothers Inc, a construction company, spends significant time and money to dismantle older houses piece by piece in order to reuse the wood. Although the company does earn a net profit despite these expenditures, the company could earn even more by adopting a new policy. Brothers’ new land contains hundreds of trees that are already slated to be razed; the company should use those trees for wood instead of the old houses

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports Brothers’ policy to reuse wood?

It is a waste of resources for a company that needs wood to chop down hundreds of trees but not use the wood.

There is virtually no difference in quality between wood reclaimed from older houses and wood processed from newly-chopped trees.

Sawmills can reshape previously used wood much more quickly and cost-effectively than it can shape whole trees.

It would cost the company less to use the trees it already owns than to pay to dismantle homes for previously used wood.

The number of older houses available for dismantling is growing steadily.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Ankur87 » Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:17 am
IMO : D
Join the discussion

by ice_rush » Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:45 am
choice C gives us a good reason to continue reusing the wood rather than cut down new trees.
Join the discussion

by das.ashmita » Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:56 pm
Brothers Inc, a construction company, spends significant time and money to dismantle older houses piece by piece in order to reuse the wood. Although the company does earn a net profit despite these expenditures, the company could earn even more by adopting a new policy. Brothers’ new land contains hundreds of trees that are already slated to be razed; the company should use those trees for wood instead of the old houses

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports Brothers’ policy to reuse wood?
It is a waste of resources for a company that needs wood to chop down hundreds of trees but not use the wood. - out of scope

There is virtually no difference in quality between wood reclaimed from older houses and wood processed from newly-chopped trees. - out of scope

Sawmills can reshape previously used wood much more quickly and cost-effectively than it can shape whole trees. - supports why re-usage is better option

It would cost the company less to use the trees it already owns than to pay to dismantle homes for previously used wood. - weakens

The number of older houses available for dismantling is growing steadily. - although its availability is increasing, how is it more beneficial than newly-chopped trees is not mentioned.

IMO C
let me know if I am wrong :)
Join the discussion