BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Wood pulp

Expert replies
by crackgmat007 » Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:27 pm
Exports of United States wood pulp will rise consid-
erably during this year. The reason for the rise is
that the falling value of the dollar will make it
cheaper for paper manufacturers in Japan and West-
ern Europe to buy American wood pulp than to get
it from any other source.

Which of the following is an assumption made in
drawing the conclusion above?
(A) Factory output of paper products in Japan and
Western Europe will increase sharply during
this year.
(B) The quality of the wood pulp produced in the
United States would be adequate for the
purposes of Japanese and Western European
paper manufacturers.
(C) Paper manufacturers in Japan and Western
Europe would prefer to use wood pulp
produced in the United States if cost were
not a factor.
(D) Demand for paper products made in Japan and
Western Europe will not increase sharply
during this year.
(E) Production of wood pulp by United States
companies will not increase sharply during
this year.

Is the correct answer B or C?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by dendude » Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:38 pm
The answer will have to be C
Only it provides a co-relation between the price of Wood pulp and the demand in Japan and W.Europe.

The quality of the wood pulp would be considered OOS with respect to the argument
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:42 pm
IMO B
The quality of the wood pulp produced in the
United States is NOT adequate for the
purposes of Japanese and Western European
paper manufacturers, then there is no reason they would buy it and so exports will not increase

C- rejected because talks about when cost is not a factor. But the argument is all about when cost IS a factor i.e. the falling value of dollar.

I was confused between A and B. B just looks better but anyone explain why not A?
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:46 pm
B for me too.

C rejected because the stem focuses on the cost. C's jab at US wood pulp quality goes against the cost focused conclusion.
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Thu Jul 16, 2009 6:20 pm
IMO-C

Quality is the issue here. Only the cost is issue(depreciation in Dollar Value=>cost)
I was confused between A and B. B just looks better but anyone explain why not A?
(A) Factory output of paper products in Japan and
Western Europe will increase sharply during
this year.
When Factory paper demand increases, so even if the cost is a hurdle, Japan and Western Europe will continue to import no matter what is the cost

Hope this helps
Join the discussion

by pandeyvineet24 » Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:13 pm
C for me too.
this implies that Japan and western Europe will use United States wood pulp If it was cheaper.


(B) The quality of the wood pulp produced in the
United States would be adequate for the
purposes of Japanese and Western European
paper manufacturers.

Quality of wood is never a concern in the argument.
Join the discussion

C

by brick2009 » Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:55 pm
Japs and euro would prefer to get pulp from US....THAN any other source..

So US is highly preferred.. (can infer safely)

C: All this while they were not able to use their "preferred" provider..as $ value was high.. now with depreciating $....that is no more a concern..

So we can conclude safely that.. Japanese and Europeans will prefer buying
US wood pulp..hence the expected increase.


Btw: What is the OA? plz..
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:54 am
IMO B

in C even if japan don't prefer america... a decrease in dollar value will make japan to buy from america...

but if quality is compromised... then japan will look for other option...
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:26 am
IMO B

in C even if japan don't prefer america... a decrease in dollar value will make japan to buy from america...

but if quality is compromised... then japan will look for other option...
How you know if the quality deteriorates, Japan will look for other options?
Is there any info in the question?? :shock:

Anyways, can we have the OA?
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:17 am
I got this question from two different sources. OA in one is B & other is C. So thought of checking in the forum. Looks like its debatable.
Join the discussion

by brick2009 » Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:57 am
Why B?

B talks abt quality...by including quality it is adding information that is not part of the original argument..

I think "quality" was implicit to the original argument..
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:23 pm
It should be C, nowhere the argument talks about quality...!!
Join the discussion

by ogbeni » Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:09 pm
Oh goodness! OA please! I'm going crazy with Option B vs. Option C
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:17 pm
Saw this question in two sources. One has C & other has B as the answer.
Join the discussion

by cata1yst » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:57 pm
I thought B as well. No one gave a clear cut answer between B and C.

I found this on Manhattan's forum...

https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/us- ... t7374.html

"If you negate B. you get,

The quality of the wood pulp produced in the United States would NOT be adequate for the purposes of Japanese and Western European paper manufacturers.

This destroys the argument, and so is a valid assumption. If US pulp is not suitable for Japanese and Western European paper manufacturers, then there will be no (or less) exports of United States wood pulp.

C is close. It strengthens the argument but is not necessary."
Join the discussion