BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Wood Harvesting Technique

Expert replies
by vinny_r78 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:38 am
The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had two especially insidious environmentsl impacts. The first is that it causes erosion, as hillsides that were covered with mature trees are abrubtly exposed to the full impact of the elements. The second is that when new trees grow in the area they are often nearly all of the same age and species, and therefore highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.

from the passage above, it can be properly inferred that wood harvesting technique can continue with fewer negative impacts if which of the following techniques is employed.

A) Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.
B) Using selctive harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.
C) Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.
D) Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides
E) Planting monocultures, a single species of fast growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.


Can you please provide the answer and reasoning behind your answer?

I will provide OA after sometime.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by kvcpk » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:51 am
IMO B.

Though B is not 100% satisfactory because it introduces other harvesting techniques, I will go with B as Other options do not seem close to me..


What is OA?
Join the discussion

by ashish2104 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:56 am
I too would go with B.

Only two things are stated i the argument.
1) erosion and 2) infestation due to smiliar age and species

based on these,
only B can be infered by saying that, if we have a blend of martued and young trees, infestation issue is resolved.

What is the OA?
Join the discussion