BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Winter Sledding

Expert replies
by Dean Jones » Sun Jan 08, 2012 12:24 pm
Dear Friends,

I was having problems in answering the following question.

In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher
last winter than it was ten years ago. Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?

A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
B. Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
D. Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
E. Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.


Please help.

OA after some discussions.

Regards
Deano.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by karthikpandian19 » Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:58 pm
IMO B is the right one, as it indicates only few children are concerned with safety gear

A. Irrelevant. As it talks about wooden sleds
C. Tells abt the Plastic sleds advantage but irrelevant to this situation abt injuries
D. Close to B, But it indicates general statement abt injuries which can be assumed for now and 10 years before also
E. Undermines the wooden sled

What is the OA?
Dean Jones wrote:Dear Friends,

I was having problems in answering the following question.

In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher
last winter than it was ten years ago. Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?

A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
B. Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
D. Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
E. Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.


Please help.

OA after some discussions.

Regards
Deano.
Join the discussion

by sam2304 » Sun Jan 08, 2012 6:23 pm
Agree with karthikpandian

IMO B.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by mankey » Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:17 am
Very clearly C.

What is the OA?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by techyrajeev » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:59 pm
IMO 'C'

Increase in the application of plastic sled will increase the number of accident but it does not mean that plastic sled is more dangerous.

You can also assume that if application of the sled increases, number of people using it also increases.
Join the discussion

by ArunangsuSahu » Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:38 pm
The Force of Evidence

The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher
last winter than it w
as ten years ago

So If sledding is higher there will be more congestion and chances of collision

So if Helmets are not there then injuries
will be higher

(B)
Join the discussion

by sk8legend408 » Sat Jan 14, 2012 7:24 am
The answer is C.

Conclusion - plastic sleds are more dangerous than wooden sleds.

Premise - the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.

There could be many reasons why such as a huge increase in the population, thereby more people sledding and obviously the number of people involved in accidents increasing. Another reason could be plastic sleds can be used in more types of situations than can wooden sleds.

Answer choice C clearly suggests that plastic sleds can be used in a variety of snow conditions so they are used a lot more often and that is why the number of children injured has increased...not because plastic sleds are more dangerous.
Join the discussion