BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

While many politicians have been able to abuse recent change

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 944
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 8 times
by RBBmba@2014 » Tue Apr 28, 2015 3:30 am
While many politicians have been able to abuse recent changes in the law, the original spirit of the bill was that it was equally applied to all residents, no matter their socio-economic status.

A. that it was equally applied to all residents, no matter their socio-economic status
B. that it was equally applied to all residents, and their socio-economic status did not matter
C. that it was to be applied equally to all residents, no matter their socio-economic status
D. that it be applied equally to every resident, no matter their socio-economic status
E. that it be equally applied to all residents, no matter their socio-economic status

OA : E

P.S: I'm stuck between C & E. Experts - could you please share your analysis ?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:08 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote: P.S: I'm stuck between C & E. Experts - could you please share your analysis ?
C: the original spirit...was that it was
Here, WAS that it WAS is redundant.
Eliminate C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 944
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 8 times

by RBBmba@2014 » Sat May 02, 2015 6:49 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
RBBmba@2014 wrote: P.S: I'm stuck between C & E. Experts - could you please share your analysis ?
C: the original spirit...was that it was
Here, WAS that it WAS is redundant.
Eliminate C.
Mitch - Had the option C been "the original spirit...was that it is" instead of WAS that it WAS then would it have been any different ? Because as you said in the other thread "A bill is a PROPOSAL for a law", so I think, still C would have been wrong against E. Right ?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:39 amFollowed by: 3 members
Location: Rourkela Odisha India
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:650

by akash singhal » Sat May 02, 2015 9:40 pm
As, already stated
was that it was ..... is redundant
so cancel A,B,C
Now, D pronoun "their" does not match its antecedent "every resident"in number so D also cancels

Leaving E as the option...

If I am wrong do Explain, further argument is appreciated....
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 132
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 2:52 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 4 times

by aflaam » Wed Apr 27, 2016 2:01 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
RBBmba@2014 wrote: P.S: I'm stuck between C & E. Experts - could you please share your analysis ?
C: the original spirit...was that it was
Here, WAS that it WAS is redundant.
Eliminate C.
Hello Mitch, dont you think this SC (employing subjunctive ) is not valid in the first place, because their is no wish/desire/command in this SC?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:35 am
aflaam wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
RBBmba@2014 wrote: P.S: I'm stuck between C & E. Experts - could you please share your analysis ?
C: the original spirit...was that it was
Here, WAS that it WAS is redundant.
Eliminate C.
Hello Mitch, dont you think this SC (employing subjunctive ) is not valid in the first place, because their is no wish/desire/command in this SC?
In the OA, the original spirit of the bill implies the following:
It was the lawmakers' WISH that the law BE APPLIED equally to all residents.
Since the bill was written with this wish, the usage of the subjunctive -- be applied -- is justified.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1