BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

While atomism, a natural philosophy

Expert replies
by YellowSapphire » Sun Jun 12, 2011 6:30 am
While atomism, a natural philosophy common to
numerous ancient traditions including Jainism and Greek
metaphysics, revolves around an idea of the atom
fundamentally similar to our unit of modern physics, the
(5) philosophical apprehension of the term is altogether
more abstract. While the philosophical atom can have any
number of qualities, such as infinitesimal size,
indestructibility, immutability, and instantaneous
existence, it is almost intrinsically unlike the
(10) physical atom, whose characteristics have been the
object of progressive precision throughout the history
of science, in that its actual physical makeup is in a
sense immaterial. Briefly put, the metaphysical atom is
the basic indivisible unit of existence, not just of matter;
(15) the natural world as perceived by an atomist consists of
nothing but atoms and void, the former traveling through
the latter and coupling with each other in a series of
productive collisions that result in the world's
various macroscopic substances. True atomism holds that
(20) there is nothing else in the world: composite objects
such as plants and planets actually do not exist,
leading the atomist position down a path that seems to
end in nihilism-accounting for the difficulty many
philosophers have had historically in espousing it.
(25) (Simples theory eventually emerged as a counterpart to
atomism that granted ontological validity to objects qua
confederations of atoms.) Interestingly, the divergence
between physical and philosophical atoms only truly came
about in the twentieth century with the discovery of
(30) subatomic particles, prior to which chemists and
physicists viewed the atom in accordance with its
etymology-the Greek a-tomos literally means "not
cuttable."

Simples theory can be defined as all of the following EXCEPT:

A: A variant of atomism that allows for objects not made up of atoms
B: An alternative to atomism introduced as a reaction to its nihilist leanings
C: An ontological system whereby macroscopic substances are considered real
D: A version of philosophical atomism more faithful to the conclusions of physics
E: A way for plants and planets to exist within a loose framework of atoms and void

OA: A
Yellow Sapphire
Join the discussion
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

by vikram4689 » Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:09 am
We need to choose an option that defines simple theories, which emerged as a counterpart atomists' theory and which philosophers have no difficulty in accepting. I think A should be correct if EXCEPT is not there. Can you share explanation given by Grockit.
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion