BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

which one contradicts

Expert replies
by finance » Fri Jul 22, 2011 4:28 am
According to a study by the Human Resources Ministry, between 1950 and 1980, the number of beggars in India continued to increase but at a rate lower than that of the Indian population.

Which of the following statements directly contradicts the information above?

(A) The number of beggars in the general population increased slightly in the thirty year period between 1950 and 1980.

(B) The proportion of beggars in the Indians below the poverty line remained constant over the thirty year period.

(3) The rate of increase in the number of people below the poverty line was more than the rate of growth of the general population over the thirty year period.

(D) The proportion of beggars in the general population increased from 22% in 1950 to 26% in 1980.

(E) The ratio of beggars in the total population of India was half as much as the ratio of the unemployed in the general population of the country.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by dinaroneo » Fri Jul 22, 2011 4:59 am
IMOC
Join the discussion

by gmatblood » Sat Jul 23, 2011 1:58 am
will go with C
Join the discussion

by finance » Sat Jul 23, 2011 2:47 am
I thought the same, that it should be C but the OA is D, and I still did NOT understand why?
Join the discussion

by Ozlemg » Sun Jul 24, 2011 1:26 am
First of all it is not C. This is from gmat-secrets. You can't simply conclude people below the poverty line are beggars.

If the proportion of beggars to the general population is now higher, then they, as a group, grew faster than that of the population... The rate of beggars should have decreased if the above statement were true.
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion

by dinaroneo » Sun Jul 24, 2011 2:06 am
Hey, you are right!
Thanks.
D should be the answer clearly..
Join the discussion

by mankey » Fri Nov 25, 2011 11:09 pm
Simple but finding it confusing. Please help.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by niazsna786 » Sat Nov 26, 2011 10:17 am
IMO : D

C compares rate of increase in no. of people below poverty line .. ppl below poverty are not necessarily beggers.. C is not correct.

D clearly contradicts the conclusion of the statement.
Join the discussion