BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

whether-or

Expert replies
by bigguy_aug » Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:26 pm
It is not known whether paper made from rocks will emerge as the leading type of ecologically-friendly paper, or if, as scientists continue to look for alternatives, another solution will become the standard.

if, as scientists continue to look for alternatives, another solution will become the standard

if scientists continued to look for alternatives they would standardize another solution

another solution would become the standard if scientists continue to look for alternatives

whether another solution would become the standard alternative that scientists continue to look for

whether another solution will become the standard if scientists continue to look for alternatives
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by rishab1988 » Sun Nov 14, 2010 2:45 pm
It is not known whether paper made from rocks will emerge as the leading type of ecologically-friendly paper, or if, as scientists continue to look for alternatives, another solution will become the standard.

if, as scientists continue to look for alternatives, another solution will become the standard

if scientists continued to look for alternatives they would standardize another solution

another solution would become the standard if scientists continue to look for alternatives

whether another solution would become the standard alternative that scientists continue to look for

whether another solution will become the standard if scientists continue to look for alternatives

According to me the answer is D;

Here's why:

There are 2 splits

1)There is a 2:1:2 split. if in first 2, whether in last 2, and neither of those in the middle one.

A, and B out for using incorrect || ism. You can either use Whether X or Y or use Whether X or Whether Y. You cannot use whether or if.

2) This split is a meaning issue " if scientists continue to look for alternatives" in B,C, and E vs if, as scientists...., another solution will become the standard as in A. That is, there is an issue of certainty (whether scientists are actually looking for alternatives or they may look for alternatives". We must preserve the original meaning of the sentence,which states that scientists were actually looking for alternatives. So, C and E out.

We are left with D. The answer,according to me.

What is the OA?
Join the discussion

by bigguy_aug » Sun Nov 14, 2010 2:59 pm
OA E

Can someone explain why C is wrong? To me the 2nd whether looks redundant.
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Sun Nov 14, 2010 6:02 pm
bigguy_aug wrote:OA E

Can someone explain why C is wrong? To me the 2nd whether looks redundant.
"Whether" needs to be repeated when you have additional binary options.

"He left five hours ago; I want to know whether he visited his friend and went to the store" has two outcomes:
he went to the store and visited his friend OR did neither.

"He left five hours ago; I want to know whether he visited his friend and whether he went to the store" has four outcomes:

1. He went to the store and visited his friend
2. He went to the store and did not visit his friend
3. He did not go to the store, but visited his friend
4. He neither went to the store nor visited his friend
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1