BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Where am I going wrong - Inequalities

Expert replies
by imhimanshu » Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:52 am
Hi Experts,
Can you please verify where I am going wrong.

If m <> 0, is m^3> m^2

1) m>0
2) m^2>m

my approach -

Since it is given that m^3> m^2

and m^2 > 0 (always). So, it is safe to divide by m^2
Hence, the question becomes is m>1

1. Insufficient as m can lie b/w 0-1
2. Here I am going wrong.

Given - m^2>m
My take -
m^2-m > 0
m(m-1)>0
so, m>0 or m>1
So,m must be greater than 1.
But as per solution, It is incorrect. I know, this can be solved by plugging the values. However, I usually avoid them because I usually miss one or the other scenario. I would appreciate if someone can help me in catching the error.

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kmittal82 » Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:58 am
imhimanshu wrote:Hi Experts,
m(m-1)>0
so, m>0 or m>1
So,m must be greater than 1.
You missed m < 1 as a solution as well. For a product of 2 numbers to be greater than 0, they are either both positive (the case you considered), or they are both negative (the case you missed). Hope that helps
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:06 am
imhimanshu wrote:Hi Experts,
Can you please verify where I am going wrong.

If m <> 0, is m^3> m^2

1) m>0
2) m^2>m

my approach -

Since it is given that m^3> m^2

and m^2 > 0 (always). So, it is safe to divide by m^2
Hence, the question becomes is m>1

1. Insufficient as m can lie b/w 0-1
2. Here I am going wrong.

Given - m^2>m
My take -
m^2-m > 0
m(m-1)>0
so, m>0 or m>1
So,m must be greater than 1.
But as per solution, It is incorrect. I know, this can be solved by plugging the values. However, I usually avoid them because I usually miss one or the other scenario. I would appreciate if someone can help me in catching the error.

Thanks
m(m - 1) > 0 implies any of the following two cases,
  • 1. m and (m - 1) both positive --> m > 1
    2. m and (m - 1) both negative ---> m < 0
Hence, statement 2 is not sufficient.

Taking both statements together: As m is positive from statement 1, m must be greater than 1 from statement 2. SUFFICIENT

The correct answer is C.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:11 am
imhimanshu wrote: Given - m^2>m
My take -
m^2-m > 0
m(m-1)>0
so, m>0 or m>1
So,m must be greater than 1.
The reasoning in red is incorrect.

Given that m(m-1)>0:
The critical points are m=0 and m=1.
These are the only values for m that will make the left hand side equal 0.
When m equals any other value, the left hand side will be less than or greater than 0.
To determine the range of m, test one value to the left and right of each critical point.

m<0:
Plug m=-1 into m(m-1)>0:
-1*(-1-1) > 0
-1 * -2 > 0
2 > 0.
This works.
m<0 IS part of the range.

0<m<1:
Plug m= 1/2 into m(m-1)>0:
(1/2)*((1/2)-1) > 0
1/2 * -1/2 > 0
-1/4 > 0.
Doesn't work.
0<m<1 is NOT part of the range.

m>1:
Plug m= 2 into m(m-1)>0:
2*(2-1) > 0
2 * 1 > 0
2 > 0.
This works.
m>1 IS part of the range.

Thus, statement 2 indicates that m<0 OR that m>1.
Insufficient.

When the two statements are combined, the only range for m that satisfies both statements is m>1.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by imhimanshu » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:28 am
Thanks Experts for catching the error. I hope not to repeat the same again.
Join the discussion