Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

When people evade

Expert replies
by atulmangal » Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:13 pm
source:--Knewton-prep

When people evade fares on public transportation systems, they begin a vicious cycle. Fare evasion results in lost revenue, which forces local governments to raise public transportation fares, which raises the public transportation costs for those who use the public transportation and who do not evade fares. This, in turn, encourages even more people to evade fares.

The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?


(A) An increase in public transportation fares is an incentive for commuters to buy bulk transportation passes at a discount.

(B) Some methods for catching fare evaders may save the transportation system more money in lost fare evasions than they cost, but their success rate is variable.

(C) Public transportation users who routinely evade paying fares cannot be induced to stop evading fares through a reduction of fares unless the penalties for fare evasion are simultaneously increased.

(D) When local governments initially set public transportation prices designed to raise a certain amount of revenue, they do not factor in the costs of fare evasion.

(E) The fare amount that will induce a rider to begin evading fares is the same for all public transportation users.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by boazkhan » Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:44 pm
IMO D
Join the discussion

by abhi0697 » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:01 pm
IMO D.
Local government will increase fare after evasion only if initially they have not factored this amount while setting public transportation prices.
Join the discussion

by cyrwr1 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:36 am
D, there is a similar question in one of the OG's I believe regarding tax evaders.
Join the discussion

by VivianKerr » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:10 am
CONCLUSION: Evading fares = vicious cycle (more people will evade fares)

EVIDENCE: Evading fares = lost revenue = raise fares = higher cost to public

ASSUMPTIONS: Each step must lead to the next; there can be no other solution. The gov't must raise fares. The higher fares must cause more fare evasion.

QUESTION REPHRASE: What must happen for the conclusion to work?

PREDICTION: Anything that continues to link evading fares to MORE people evading fares.

A - This would weaken the argument.
B - If the success rate is "variable" it doesn't help or hurt.
C - How does this lead to MORE people evading fares?
D - CORRECT. This strengthens the link in the cycle.
E - Irrelevant.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:55 am
OA is indeed D guys
Join the discussion

by amit2k9 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:17 pm
the vicious cycles is happening because of the revenue lost due to fare evading.

D brings out this reasoning.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Join the discussion