Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

wetlands-protection bill

Expert replies
by thephoenix » Sat May 22, 2010 3:46 am
Politician: Critics of wetlands-protection bill are delaying passage of this important legislation merely on the grounds that they disagree with its new more restrictive definition of the term “wetlands.” But this bill will place stricter limits on the development of wetlands than the existing regulations do. Therefore, in quibbling over semantics, critics of this bill show that they care little about what really happens to our wetlands.
The politician’s reply to the opponents of the wetlands-protection bill is most vulnerable to which one of the following criticisms?
(A) It falsely identifies the motives of those who have criticized the wetlands-protection bill with the motives of all those who are opposed to conservation.
(B) It does not adequately recognize the possibility that the definition of the word “wetlands” determines the impact of the legislation.
(C) It assumes without justification that those who criticized the wetlands-protection bill stand to profit if the bill is defeated.
(D) It fails to provide a defense for a less restrictive definition of “wetlands.”
(E) It attempts to defend the credibility of the author of the bill rather than defending the bill itself.
[spoiler]i was confused b/n A and C[/spoiler]
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gsinghal » Sat May 22, 2010 4:48 am
I will go with C

A says "motives of all those who are opposed to conservation", nothing has been said regarding this perspective in the argument.
Join the discussion

by ansumania » Sat May 22, 2010 10:04 am
but it never says that they get profited......it simply says that they less care......

again in A, has the categorization really been done between 2 groups of critics? I didn't find it anywhere....

OA pl........
Join the discussion

by paes » Sun May 23, 2010 10:50 pm
IMO B

C : says about profit but argument is not saying anything about profit.

OA plz.
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Mon May 24, 2010 12:15 am
I will go with B

(A) It falsely identifies the motives of those who have criticized the wetlands-protection bill with the motives of all those who are opposed to conservation.--no mention about 'all those who are opposed to conservation',it only mentions about critics.INCORRECT

(B) It does not adequately recognize the possibility that the definition of the word “wetlands� determines the impact of the legislation.--CORRECT.as the base of the politicians argument is critics are worried about the definition,not the overall benefit of the bill.But is the definition itself has impact on overall benefit then politicians argument will not be valid any more.

(C) It assumes without justification that those who criticized the wetlands-protection bill stand to profit if the bill is defeated.
No mention about critics will be profited .INCORRECT
(D) It fails to provide a defense for a less restrictive definition of “wetlands.�-No explanation offered for the definition of 'wetland' .INCORRECT
(E) It attempts to defend the credibility of the author of the bill rather than defending the bill itself. -out of context.INCORRECT
“If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.”
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Mon May 24, 2010 12:44 am
grt guys
OA is B
i was surprised at my comprehension level when i saw the OA , i wasted 2 and a half min for deciding b/n two wrong answers
thanks liferosk for the explanation
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working
Join the discussion