BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Weaklings

Expert replies
by neoreaves » Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:05 am
All too many weaklings are also cowards, and few cowards fail to be fools. Thus there must be at least one person who is both a weakling and a fool.

The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that of which of the following?

a) all weasels are carnivores and no carnivores fail to be non-herbivores, so some weasels are non-herbivores.

b) few moralists have the courage to act according to the principles they profess, and few saints have the ability to articulate the principles by which they live, so it follows that few people can both act like saints and speak like moralists.

c) some painters are dancers, since some painters are musicians, and some musicians are dancers.

d) if an act is virtuous then it is autonomous, for acts are not virtuous unless they are free and acts are not free unless they are autonomous.

e) a majority of voting population favors a total ban, but no one who favors a total ban is opposed to stiffer tariffs, so at least one voter is opposed to stiffer tariffs.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Phirozz » Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:37 pm
IMO C.


"All too many weaklings are also cowards" is same as "some weaklings are cowards"

some painters are dancers, since some painters are musicians, and some musicians are dancers.

C can be written as "some painters are musicians and some musicians are dancers, therefore some painters are dancers''

By elimination also we can arrive at C.
Join the discussion

by vivek1110 » Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:16 pm
IMO E? OA?
Is caught between a rock and a hard place!
Join the discussion

by mrinal2100 » Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:16 pm
i think phirozz you have go this wrong

"All too many weaklings are also cowards" is same as "some weaklings are cowards"

all to many means there are many of them who are cowards which is almost equivalent to all of them
Join the discussion

by neoreaves » Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:18 pm
OA is indeed C ....this guy Phirozz is a wiz of CR ....im posting all the CRs from LSAT and even then he gets them all right
Join the discussion