BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Weaken

Expert replies
by kiranlegend » Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:24 am
Vorland’s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking in restaurants. The
objection that the ban would reduce restaurants’ revenues is ill founded. Several towns in
Vorland enacted restaurant smoking restrictions five years ago. Since then, the amount
the government collects in restaurant meal taxes in those towns has increased 34 percent,
on average, but only 26 percent elsewhere in Vorland. The amount collected in
restaurant meal taxes closely reflects restaurants’ revenues.
Which of the following, if true, most undermines the defense of the government’s plan?
A. When the state first imposed a restaurant meal tax, opponents predicted that
restaurants’ revenues would decline as a result, a prediction that proved to be
correct in the short term.
B. The tax on meals in restaurants is higher than the tax on many other goods and
services.
C. Over the last five years, smoking has steadily declined throughout Vorland.
D. In many of the towns that restrict smoking in restaurants, restaurants can maintain
separate dining areas where smoking is permitted.
E. Over the last five years, government revenues from sales taxes have grown no
faster in the towns with restaurant smoking restrictions than in the towns that have
no such restrictions.

what is the conclusion here?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by raunekk » Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:26 am
IMO:D
Join the discussion

by kiranlegend » Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:52 am
raunekk wrote:IMO:D
raunekk, that is abs. correct.. conclusion pls?
Join the discussion

by rolodex » Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:35 am
Premise1: Vorland’s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking in restaurants.

Conclusion1: The objection that the ban would reduce restaurants’ revenues is ill founded.

Premise2: Several towns in Vorland enacted restaurant smoking restrictions five years ago. Since then, the amount the government collects in restaurant meal taxes in those towns has increased 34 percent,
on average, but only 26 percent elsewhere in Vorland.

Premise 3: The amount collected in restaurant meal taxes closely reflects restaurants’ revenues. (this looks like the conclusion but it is not)
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Wed May 11, 2016 3:12 am
I will Go with option D in this case
Join the discussion