BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Weaken Question

Expert replies
by shekhar.kataria » Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:11 am
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced academic libraries
used only by academic researchers to drastically reduce their list of subscriptions.
Some have suggested that in each academic discipline subscription decisions should
be determined solely by a journal's usefulness in that discipline, measured by the
frequency with which it is cited in published writings by researchers in the
discipline.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the suggestion
described above?


(A) The non-academic readership of a scholarly or scientific journal can be
accurately gauged by the number of times articles appearing in it are cited in
daily newspapers and popular magazines.
(B) The average length of a journal article in some sciences, such as physics, i s less
than half the average length of a journal article in some other academic
disciplines, such as history.
(C) The increasingly expensive scholarly journals are less and less likely to be
available to the general public from non-academic public libraries.
(D) Researchers often will not cite a journal article that has influenced their work if
they think that the journal in which it appears is not highly regarded by the
leading researchers in the mainstream of the discipline
(E) In some academic disciplines, controversies which begin in the pages of one
journal spill over into articles in other journals that are widely read by
researchers in the discipline.


Confusion between D and E. CA-----------> D

Please provide explaination why the other is wrong.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by shovan85 » Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:32 am
Weaken the suggestion.

Premises:
Soaring price so reduce the list of subscription.
How to reduce the list? Discipline wise the usefulness of Journal be determined. (Suggestion)
How to determine the usefulness of a Journal? Frequency with which the Journal's usefulness is cited in published writings by researcher in that discipline.

Now Options:

(A) Non-academic: Out of discussion
(B) Length of Journal is none of our concern but the content cited by some researcher.
(C) Yes let it be who cares ;)
(D) Researchers often will not cite a journal article that has influenced their work if they think that the journal in which it appears is not highly regarded by the leading researchers in the mainstream of the discipline.
So though the journal is USEFUL it is not cited so the chances are that the useful journal will not be listed in the list of subscription.
Really weakens :)
(E) Controversies starts from one journal. Goes to other journal. Means spreads from one journal to other (Widely read). Whatever be the controversy but it is being read by researchers not cited by them. Worst scenario the researchers will not cite the journal's . Thus will not be enlisted in the library. So it does not weaken .
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Join the discussion