BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Weaken argument question

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:51 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 6 times
by givemeanid » Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:24 pm
A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was instituted last year. The program was clearly a success. Last year, the incidence of students smoking on school premises decreased by over 70 percent.

Which of the following if true, would most seriously weaken the argument in the passage?

(A) The author of this statement is a school system official hoping to generate good publicity for the anti-smoking program.

(B) Most student who smoke stopped smoking on school premises last year continued to smoke when away from school.

(C) Last year, another policy change made it much easier for students to leave and return to school grounds during the school day.

(D) The school system spent more on anti-smoking education programs last year than it did in all previous years.

(E) The amount of time students spent in anti-smoking education programs last year resulted in a reduction of in-class hours devoted to academic subjects.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:51 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Silicon valley, California
Thanked: 30 times

by jayhawk2001 » Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:33 pm
I believe A, D and E are out of scope.

B seems to concur with the central message in the argument -
it says students did not smoke on premises.

C weakens the argument. If the other policy directly led to a decrease
in the number of students smoking on premises, the anti-smoking
program could not have helped and so could not have been a success.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:51 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 6 times

by givemeanid » Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:47 pm
OA is C. You are right. I got it. Thanks!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:06 pm

by Jhyphi » Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:31 am
Isn't C an irrelevant point unless you combine it with something about students smoking away from school?

So shouldn't it be B? I'm saying this with the assumption that the "anti-smoking education program.....was clearly a success" is the main argument.

So smoking away from campus is contradictory to anti-smoking.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:50 pm
Location: Chicago
Thanked: 1 times

by [email protected] » Sat Jul 28, 2007 4:08 pm
I also think B should be the answer as it says the program was successful.However it was success only inside the school premises .
Please explain how C is the answer as it seems irrevelant
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:51 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 6 times

by givemeanid » Sun Jul 29, 2007 3:52 pm
[email protected] wrote:I also think B should be the answer as it says the program was successful.However it was success only inside the school premises .
Please explain how C is the answer as it seems irrevelant
The argument is concerned only with smoking on the premises. If the students stopped smoking on the premises, then the program was a success (irrespective of whether the students smoked outside the premises). B only seems to strengthen this. C is the right choice.
So It Goes
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 7:46 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 3 times

by sk8ternite » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:04 am
but C states implies that students smoked off school premises
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:06 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 2 times

by perfectstranger » Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:47 am
Last year,the incidence of students smoking on school premises decreased by over 70%.

C)Last year, another policy change made it much easier for students to leave and return to school grounds during the school day.

Assume they can go outside then smoke and return back to school then they do not smoke at the school and this will not be arised from the policy mentioned in the paragraph.
Please do not post answers visibly . Please hide them or post them later after the discussion.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 208
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:32 am
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 2 times

Re: Weaken argument question

by vikram_k51 » Mon Aug 17, 2009 5:06 am
givemeanid wrote:A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was instituted last year. The program was clearly a success. Last year, the incidence of students smoking on school premises decreased by over 70 percent.

Which of the following if true, would most seriously weaken the argument in the passage?

(A) The author of this statement is a school system official hoping to generate good publicity for the anti-smoking program.

(B) Most student who smoke stopped smoking on school premises last year continued to smoke when away from school.

(C) Last year, another policy change made it much easier for students to leave and return to school grounds during the school day.

(D) The school system spent more on anti-smoking education programs last year than it did in all previous years.

(E) The amount of time students spent in anti-smoking education programs last year resulted in a reduction of in-class hours devoted to academic subjects.

Will go with B.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Mon Aug 17, 2009 5:43 am
Agree, should be B. C is a good option only if B is true. Whats the sourrce of the OA
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:02 pm
Thanked: 15 times

by life is a test » Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:33 am
[email protected] wrote:I also think B should be the answer as it says the program was successful.However it was success only inside the school premises .
Please explain how C is the answer as it seems irrevelant
Success is measured here by removing smokers off school premises- b strengthens since it achieves that - irrespective of whether or not they continue smoking outside. I think the trap is to let your knowledge influence the success here...

C says that it was not the education policy but another policy that got the smokers off school premises hence weakens.

Btw I fell for the trap also but it clicked after :)

Pls correct if my reasoning is off.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 197
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 2:47 am
Thanked: 12 times

Re: Weaken argument question

by shahdevine » Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:46 am
givemeanid wrote:A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was instituted last year. The program was clearly a success. Last year, the incidence of students smoking on school premises decreased by over 70 percent.

Which of the following if true, would most seriously weaken the argument in the passage?

(A) The author of this statement is a school system official hoping to generate good publicity for the anti-smoking program.

(B) Most student who smoke stopped smoking on school premises last year continued to smoke when away from school.

(C) Last year, another policy change made it much easier for students to leave and return to school grounds during the school day.

(D) The school system spent more on anti-smoking education programs last year than it did in all previous years.

(E) The amount of time students spent in anti-smoking education programs last year resulted in a reduction of in-class hours devoted to academic subjects.
B...

author is unequivocal in conclusion that anti-smoking program was a success. he uses word "clearly." All we need to weaken argument is a crack in "clearly." If students are smoking away from school, then program is not "clearly" a success. It might be partially, but not "clearly"..

upon review, C weakens. Because it focuses on off campus vs. on campus and points out that another program caused this...very tricky argh.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 173 times
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:08 am
Not a great GMAT question.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 18 times

by tanviet » Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:28 am
although this argument is based on causal relation- 2 events which happen at the same time are in causal relation-this weaken question do not make us find out a event which destroy the causal relation. Instead,the author makes us find an answer which destroy the evidence not destroy the reasoning

C is correct
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 164
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:34 pm
Location: Bangalore
GMAT Score:590

by iwill » Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:48 pm
I feel its B.

1. Never mentioned the aim of the program was to prevent smoking from school premises. It says anti-smoking program
2. We don't know whether school ground comes outside 'school premises'.

Thanks,
V
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply