BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Wax!

Expert replies
by gmat_perfect » Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:57 am
Patience Lovell Wright, whose traveling waxworks exhibit preceded Madame Tuscan's work by 30 year, became well known as much because of having an eccentric personality as for having skillfully rendered popular public figures in wax.

(A)well known as much because of having an eccentric personality as for having skillfully rendered popular public figures in wax
(B)well known as much for having an eccentric personality as for skillful wax renderings of popular public figures.
(C)well known as much because of her eccentric personality as she was for her skillful wax renderings of popular public figures.
(D)as well known for having an eccentric personality as having skillfully rendered popular public figures in wax.
(E)as well known for her eccentric personality as for her skillful wax renderings of popular public figures.

[spoiler]OA: E[/spoiler]

Is it incorrect to say " as much for X as for Y"?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by barcebal » Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:05 am
This sentence question is all about parallelism within the idiom. Once I started recognizing these, they became much easier because incorrect parallelism is WRONG, it's not a style preference.

So, the idiom here is as much _____ as _____

Choice A: as much BECAUSE OF HAVING.... as FOR HAVING......... BECAUSE and FOR do not match. Wrong.
Choice B: as much FOR HAVING.... as FOR SKILLFUL WAX.... The FOR matches but HAVING is not parallel to SKILLFUL WAX. One is a gerund (a verb ending in ING) and the other is a noun. Wrong.
Choice C: as much BECAUSE OF HER.... as SHE WAS... Doesn't match anything. Wrong.
Choice D: as well known FOR HAVING as HAVING. Second part doesn't have a FOR. Wrong.
Choice E: as well known FOR HER ECCENTRIC PERSONALITY as FOR HER SKILLFUL WAX RENDERINGS. FOR matches FOR. "Eccentric personality" matches "her skillful wax renderings" because they are both nouns. Correct.

I don't think saying "as much for X as for Y" is wrong necessarily if you have parallelism, but in this sentence there was never an option to use "as much for X as for Y"
Join the discussion

by paes » Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:21 am
IMO B.

A, C, D : easily eliminated .

between B and E ,

B looks parallel.

Can somebody explain how E is better than B ?
Join the discussion

by barcebal » Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:57 am
paes,

Choice B: as much FOR HAVING.... as FOR SKILLFUL WAX.... The FOR matches but HAVING is not parallel to SKILLFUL WAX. One is a gerund (a verb ending in ING) and the other is a noun. Wrong. Even though they both have "for" they are not parallel because what follows the "for" is not parallel.
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:12 am
Answer is E

as explained above, NOUN to NOUN parallelism
and the idiom (as much X as Y)...

You can add FOR (prepositions) before X and Y elements so long as the basic skeleton of idiom remains intact

Example,

#BOTH X AND Y
#BOTH FOR X and FOR Y
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1