BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Wasteful Packaging

Expert replies
by fighting_cax » Tue Feb 10, 2009 3:59 pm
Many consumers are concerned about the ecological effects of wasteful packaging. This concern probably explains why stores have been quick to stock new cleaning products that have been produced in a concentrated form. The concentrated form is packaged in smaller containers that use less plastic and require less transportation space.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the explanation offered above?
(A) Few consumers believe that containers of concentrated cleaning products are merely small packages of regular cleaning products.
(B) The containers in which concentrated cleaning products are packaged are no harder to recycle than those in which regular cleaning products are packaged.
(C) Those concentrated cleaning products that are intended to be used diluted have clear instructions for dilution printed on their labels.
(D) The smaller containers of concentrated cleaning products enable supermarkets and drugstores to increase their revenues from a given shelf space.
(E) Consumer pressure has led to the elimination of wasteful cardboard packaging that was used for compact discs.

OA is D

Please explain.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ellexay » Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:12 pm
You're looking for a reason to doubt the proposed link between (a) consumers caring about the environment and (b) the resulting increase in smaller/different packaging found in stores.

Thus, D. This answer proposes a strong *alternative* explanation by saying that the main reason for the smaller packaging is that stores are focusing on revenue, rather than consumers' concerns.
Join the discussion

by fighting_cax » Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:24 pm
Thanks Ellexay!
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:00 am
I need more clear explanation for this one....

I chose B..and i dnt know why the answer is D
Join the discussion

by cameronwu » Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:17 am
PAB2706 wrote:I need more clear explanation for this one....

I chose B..and i dnt know why the answer is D
There are a few reasons why B isn't the answer. First, the fact that large containers are just as easy to recycle does not necessarily address all ecological effects that consumers might be worried about. In our minds, we naturally make those associations of pro-environment, recycling, and kinda lump them all together into one idea. But try not to do this - only use the information the stimulus gives you. Secondly, the fact that something is easy to recycle has little bearing on the relationship between consumer ecological preferences and motivation for the store to provide certain products. Even though this answer choice slightly weakens the conclusion, you have to make a lot of assumptions - namely that "Recyclability accounts for all consumer ecological concerns."

D is the much better answer choice because it directly addresses an alternative as to why the stores might be going for smaller containers - they can put more merchandise per area and thus have more profit potential. It completely undermines the idea that stores actually care about consumer environmental preferences

The Stimulus conclusion is: "Stores adjust their products because they want to cater to the environmentally-minded customers"

D's conclusion is: "Stores adjust their products because they can put more products per shelf and make more money."

D is a direct undermining of the stimulus conclusion.
Join the discussion

by bignasty666 » Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:14 am
conclusion is that stores perceive consumers care about ecological packaging..Evidence is the smaller boxes introduced by the shops..you are required to undermine the conclusion

D does that by stating stores have introduced smaller boxes to maximise on space. hence D!!!!
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:25 pm
I'd say D but I'm afraid more because of my intuition than any logic.
Join the discussion