BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Waiters tips: Flaw in assumption

Expert replies
by rahulvsd » Sun Oct 16, 2011 6:40 am
Assessing the potential earnings of tipped service employees can be difficult. Take as an example restaurant waiters: one might assume that the more customers a waiter has, the higher his earnings will be. But this fails to take into account the degree to which the service rendered might suffer when a waiter has so many customers that he cannot fully devote himself to the needs of any of them.

The flaw in the assumption discussed in the argument to the left refers to doubts about the accuracy of which of the following claims?
Choices
A The earnings of restaurant waiters are approximately the same as the earnings of other tipped service employees.
B Restaurant waiters' primary duty is to attend to the needs of their customers.
C The potential earnings of tipped service employees should be measured by examining average earnings rather than the earnings of specific individuals.
D A restaurant waiter's potential earnings depend on the quantity of customers he serves, not on the quality of service he renders.
E A restaurant waiter's earnings depend in part on how many customers he serves.

OA : D. Can someone help me out with why option B wont be a suitable option here.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rohit_gmat » Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:32 am
ok, it took me very very long just to understand the Q stem itself...
and this is wat it means -> the argument discusses an assumption that doubts the accuracy of which of the following claims?

the argument says that ppl assume that if a waiter has more customers then, he should have more tips, but thats not right since the waiter will be unable to focus on any customer (low quality)( and this will probably get him lesser tips)...

the only choice that clearly mentions the assumption is D

B isnt close to the assumption being discussed in the argument.. the argument is all about tips, # of customers & service[/b]
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:24 pm
Thats a great question :)
Join the discussion

by garima99 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 8:49 am
rahulvsd wrote:Assessing the potential earnings of tipped service employees can be difficult. Take as an example restaurant waiters: one might assume that the more customers a waiter has, the higher his earnings will be. But this fails to take into account the degree to which the service rendered might suffer when a waiter has so many customers that he cannot fully devote himself to the needs of any of them.

The flaw in the assumption discussed in the argument to the left refers to doubts about the accuracy of which of the following claims?
Choices
A The earnings of restaurant waiters are approximately the same as the earnings of other tipped service employees.
B Restaurant waiters' primary duty is to attend to the needs of their customers.
C The potential earnings of tipped service employees should be measured by examining average earnings rather than the earnings of specific individuals.
D A restaurant waiter's potential earnings depend on the quantity of customers he serves, not on the quality of service he renders.
E A restaurant waiter's earnings depend in part on how many customers he serves.

OA : D. Can someone help me out with why option B wont be a suitable option here.
It does not matter what the primary duty of the waiter is we are concerned about the tip hence D it is
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:18 am
i read previous posts and decided to comment

the question's stimuli contains the citation of an argument, its conclusion, possible causes (not assumption, as assumptions aren't cited). It says "one can assume" and means cause only

the question stem asks for simple restatement of why the cause attacked in argument is a bad cause - it seeks restatement which is D (very easy)

now B isn't correct because it's too general. One may approach the customers in different ways - this involves quality attributes too. But we need only quantity attribute.
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by loving.achin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:28 am
This is how i saw the Q...

Assessing the potential earnings of tipped service employees can be difficult. Take as an example restaurant waiters: one might assume that the more customers a waiter has, the higher his earnings will be. But this fails to take into account the degree to which the service rendered might suffer when a waiter has so many customers that he cannot fully devote himself to the needs of any of them.

The flaw in the assumption discussed in the argument to the left refers to doubts about the accuracy of which of the following claims?
This sentence means that if you doubt one of the answers, you will get the flaw (which is mentioned in last sentence).


Why B is not the answer:-
Doubt B. i.e. Restaurant waiters primary duty is not to attend the needs of customers. Does this lead to the flaw mentioned in last sentence. NO.

Why D is the answer:-
Doubt D. i.e A waiters earning depend not on quantity of customers, but on quality of service. Does this lead to the flaw mentioned in last sentence. YES. Waiter will suffer if he has so many customers to serve and he doesn't fully devote himself to the needs of any because he is not providing quality service.
Join the discussion