wage discirimination

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:46 am
Thanked: 2 times

by martin.jonson007 » Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:35 am
josh@knewton wrote:martin.jonson007 -- I hear what you're saying about the implied "occupations," and ordinarily I'd agree with all the other experts who would caution you against such assumptions. However, the awkwardness of "the predominantly female" seems mild when compared to the faulty subject/verb agreement present in all the other answer choices. E might not be perfect--but it is the best answer!
Thanks a lot Josh...!

That's great...!

Am relieved now...

i concur 100% with your explanation now...

Thanks onece again....!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:46 am
Thanked: 2 times

by martin.jonson007 » Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:48 am
@Josh

It wud be great if You please look at this issue also..

https://www.beatthegmat.com/source-power ... tml#266483

ta

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:46 am
Thanked: 2 times

by martin.jonson007 » Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:51 am
martin.jonson007 wrote:@Josh

It wud be great if You please look at this issue also..

https://www.beatthegmat.com/source-power ... tml#266483

ta
This is the issue....

Acc to papgust's Notes :

=======================================================

"Those babies are cute, like little pandas sliding down rainbows" -- CORRECT!


"Those babies are cute, like little pandas that slide down rainbows" -- CORRECT!

=======================================================


BUT

as i learned, this is INCORRECT...! (ofcourse am not considering later part of sentence , which starts after pandas )

I request Experts to look over this issue...

B'coz this is not a small issue....!

Aspects of this issue are huge...