BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

VR # 46 marital relationships

Expert replies
by yooni246 » Fri Mar 04, 2011 9:15 am
A study of marital relationships in which one partner�s sleeping and waking cycles differ from those of the other partner reveals that such couples share fewer activities with each other and have more violent arguments than do couples in a relationship in which both partners follow the same sleeping and waking patterns. Thus, mismatched sleeping and waking cycles can seriously jeopardize a marriage.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) Married couples in which both spouses follow the same sleeping and waking patterns also occasionally have arguments that can jeopardize the couple�s marriage.
(B) The sleeping and waking cycles of individuals tend to vary from season to season.
(C) The individuals who have sleeping and waking cycles that differ significantly from those of their spouses tend to argue little with colleagues at work.
(D) People in unhappy marriages have been found to express hostility by adopting a different sleeping and waking cycle from that of their spouses.
(E) According to a recent study, most people�s sleeping and waking cycles can be controlled and modified easily.

OA is D

I'm sorry for re-raising this issue... but i can't get why B is not related.
I understand that D weakens the argument by showing that unhappy relationhip can cause the different cycle. yes.D can be answer.
However, B also can be answer by showing that the statics used is unreliable.
If "the sleeping and waking cycles of individuals tend to vary from season to season" is true, it wud mean that couples who have different cycle could have similar cycle if they were asked at different time.
where am i trapped?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by nehs » Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:01 pm
In my opinion, the answer is D. This is a question in which we show that cause occurs if effect occurs and vice versa.
Join the discussion

by Target2009 » Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:30 pm
nehs wrote:In my opinion, the answer is D. This is a question in which we show that cause occurs if effect occurs and vice versa.
Agree.. Its D..
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:34 pm
You are right to wonder about B: B would undermine the argument if we were sure that differing sleeping cycles are in fact transitory, tending to correct themselves from season to season. The text, however, contradicts this notion, stating that couples whose cycles differed, presumably for the length of the study, had more violent arguments
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:49 pm
A study of marital relationships in which one partner�s sleeping and waking cycles differ from those of the other partner reveals that such couples share fewer activities with each other and have more violent arguments than do couples in a relationship in which both partners follow the same sleeping and waking patterns. Thus, mismatched sleeping and waking cycles can seriously jeopardize a marriage

We Have to weaken theconclusion here.
The Conclusion and Evidence both are generic here and are not relevant to any specific couple.
The Evidence is focussed on a generic Observation that partners having different sleeping and waking cycles are more liable to have violent arguments than Partners who share the same sleeping and waking cycles. The evidence is not focussed on 1 particular Couple.The evidence is talking about the traits and the observations and the conclusion is focussed on an Inference .
But B would be helpful only if the study were based on 100 couples or so.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by artistocrat » Sun Apr 03, 2011 6:14 pm
Simple: flip the cause and effect, and weaken it. out of sync sleep wake cycles => jeopardized marriage TO jeopardized marriage => out of sync sleep wake cycles. BINGO!
Join the discussion

by Tani » Sun Apr 03, 2011 6:55 pm
aristocrat is right on. It's the simple case of: to weaken x causes y, simply say, no, y causes x.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by patanjali.purpose » Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:30 am
yooni246 wrote:A study of marital relationships in which one partner�s sleeping and waking cycles differ from those of the other partner reveals that such couples share fewer activities with each other and have more violent arguments than do couples in a relationship in which both partners follow the same sleeping and waking patterns. Thus, mismatched sleeping and waking cycles can seriously jeopardize a marriage.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) Married couples in which both spouses follow the same sleeping and waking patterns also occasionally have arguments that can jeopardize the couple�s marriage.
(B) The sleeping and waking cycles of individuals tend to vary from season to season.
(C) The individuals who have sleeping and waking cycles that differ significantly from those of their spouses tend to argue little with colleagues at work.
(D) People in unhappy marriages have been found to express hostility by adopting a different sleeping and waking cycle from that of their spouses.
(E) According to a recent study, most people�s sleeping and waking cycles can be controlled and modified easily.

OA is D

I'm sorry for re-raising this issue... but i can't get why B is not related.
I understand that D weakens the argument by showing that unhappy relationhip can cause the different cycle. yes.D can be answer.
However, B also can be answer by showing that the statics used is unreliable.
If "the sleeping and waking cycles of individuals tend to vary from season to season" is true, it wud mean that couples who have different cycle could have similar cycle if they were asked at different time.
where am i trapped?
Argument: Mismatch between sleeping/waking cycle leads to unhealthy relationship

Option B :The sleeping and waking cycles of individuals tend to vary from season to season. It means sleeping/waking cycle of individual vary from season to seaon ie sleeping/waking cycle does vary. This is same as RED portion of the argument above. It has no effect on the BLUE portion of the argument. Therefore even though this statement is correct it neither supports nor weaken the agrument. INCORRECT

Hope it helps
Join the discussion

by Tani » Sun Jun 26, 2011 8:12 am
The correct answer must relate to the couples. Seasonal variation is out of scope. Also, we don't know that the data is unreliable. It may be very well documented and incorporated into the study.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by Sanjay2706 » Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:23 pm
IMO D
Join the discussion