BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Vivien Thomas!

Expert replies
by gmat_perfect » Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:06 am
Vivien Thomas, who had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds, he became a cardiac surgeon and eventually to receive an honorary doctorate from Johns Hopkins University.

(A) who had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds, he became
(B) having had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds to become
(C) who, having no formal medical training, he struggled against overwhelming odds in becoming
(D) who, having had no formal medical training and struggled against overwhelming odds, became
(E) who had no formal medical training, struggled against overwhelming odds to become

Is there any example where "XX who + COMMA -ING" is correct?

Or is it always wrong to use "XX who + COMMA -ING"?

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by kvcpk » Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:18 am
to receive needs to be parallel with to become.
ACD out.

having is modifying Vivien in B which is wrong. Also the sentence looks awkward.

IMO E
Join the discussion

by Haaress » Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:49 pm
1 more for E
Join the discussion

by manjitzing » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:53 am
"to receive an honorary doctorate" should be in parallel with 'to became a cardiac surgeon '.. So we have narrowed down to B and E.
In B, sentence is seems like lacking the subject--a bit awkward.
So, E wins
Join the discussion

by paes » Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:36 am
gmat_perfect wrote:Vivien Thomas, who had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds, he became a cardiac surgeon and eventually to receive an honorary doctorate from Johns Hopkins University.

(A) who had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds, he became
(B) having had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds to become
(C) who, having no formal medical training, he struggled against overwhelming odds in becoming
(D) who, having had no formal medical training and struggled against overwhelming odds, became
(E) who had no formal medical training, struggled against overwhelming odds to become

Is there any example where "XX who + COMMA -ING" is correct?

Or is it always wrong to use "XX who + COMMA -ING"?

Thanks.
IMO E
I don't know about any such rule.
But this is a straight problem,
Why are you looking for such strange rule ?
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:43 am
Addition to your explanation we need a past tense of struggle. Therefore only A and E remains. A can be eliminated as explained by kvcpk. So the answer is E
kvcpk wrote:to receive needs to be parallel with to become.
ACD out.

having is modifying Vivien in B which is wrong. Also the sentence looks awkward.

IMO E
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1