BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Vicious cycle

Expert replies
by adi_800 » Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:43 am
70.When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income,a vicious cycle results。Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates,which causes the tax burden on non-evading taxpayers to become heavier This,in turn,encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.
The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?
(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax incomes.
(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders,and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion,bring in more than they cost.but their success rate varies from year to yean
(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue,they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.
(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.
(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade taxes.

[spoiler]
In this q, I am not sure as to whether we want to show whether vicious cycle should continue or whether vicious cycle should break..May be a silly doubt... But the OA seems to be on the lines that the vicious cycle should continue and question states that if which of the options were true, then vicious cycle could not result..
OA is C[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pnk » Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:54 am
IMO - A;

Ques stem talks abt how to break vicious cycle (more tax..more tax evaders).

C - irrelevent (neither support nor break vicious cycle)...it talks abt adequate method to calculate revenue collection
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:55 am
IMO C

The passage describes a cycle and the question asks us to find out what could trigger this cycle.

Lawmakers increase the tax rate when they are unable to generate the expected level of revenue. If lawmakers while establishing income tax rates keep in mind that there will be some tax evaders and calculate the rates accordingly, then they will be able to generate the expected level of revenue. And so they wont have to increase the tax rate, and since there is no further increase in tax rates, there wont be any increase in people not paying tax. So the cycle wont get triggered at all.

Hope that helps...
Join the discussion

by pnk » Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:29 am
Got it now. Thanks Hardrik
Join the discussion

by martin.jonson007 » Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:06 am
wen we r given such scenario then we have to consider that all given option are possible somehow... !

C option is not bad either (although flaw is there of course) BUT

A is Best among ALL option...! This will create an idealistic condition... NOTE AGAIN : we are considering here all option are possible somehow...
Join the discussion

by missionGMAT007 » Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:04 am
the cycle could not result unless something is happening. we have to find out the option which explains that.

C Explains that correctly
Join the discussion

by martin.jonson007 » Sun Jun 20, 2010 5:51 am
I again EMPHASIZE ...........

I knw A option is not practically possible..
BUT

we are asked that IF 5 OPTION WERE TRUE i.e. practicaly possibe somehow..

then

A WILL BE IDEAL...!

i don't like writing much so skipping lots of things here as well as flaws of C option...

So if experts can look into the matter ... That wud be very nice of them...!
Join the discussion