BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

very tough CR3..Please help....

Expert replies
by src_saurav » Sat Apr 04, 2015 8:49 pm
For years, scientists have proposed the idea that Mars was once covered by two huge oceans. However, ridges of rock in the northern hemisphere that seem to resemble a shoreline are too hilly to be the edges of an ocean. If it could be shown that something caused an imbalanced portion of the planet's mass to shift from these ridges of rock toward the equator, where the mass now lies, it is possible that the ridges were once actually smooth.

Which of the following can be inferred from the statements above?

a)If it is determined that the ridges of rock in the northern hemisphere of Mars were never smoother than they now are, oceans did not exist on the planet.
b) The discovery that some of Mars' equatorial mass was once part of northern-hemisphere rock ridges would support the idea that the planet was once covered by oceans.
c) If the rock ridges in the northern hemisphere of Mars were smooth at one time, some the planet's mass was once closer to the equator
d) In order for a planet to have oceans, a portion of the planet's mass must have been shifted towards the equator.
e) There is general agreement in the scientific community that Mars does not have the right atmospheric conditions to support an ocean.

My answer a as it talks about ridges being smoother or not as that is the measure of presence of ocean..
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by MartyMurray » Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:57 pm
src_saurav wrote:For years, scientists have proposed the idea that Mars was once covered by two huge oceans. However, ridges of rock in the northern hemisphere that seem to resemble a shoreline are too hilly to be the edges of an ocean. If it could be shown that something caused an imbalanced portion of the planet's mass to shift from these ridges of rock toward the equator, where the mass now lies, it is possible that the ridges were once actually smooth.

Which of the following can be inferred from the statements above?

a)If it is determined that the ridges of rock in the northern hemisphere of Mars were never smoother than they now are, oceans did not exist on the planet.
This answer choice is tempting, but what it says cannot actually be inferred from what is said in the passage. The passage merely says that particular ridges are too hilly to be part of a shoreline. It does not say that therefore oceans never existed on the planet.
b) The discovery that some of Mars' equatorial mass was once part of northern-hemisphere rock ridges would support the idea that the planet was once covered by oceans.
This can be inferred from the passage. If some of Mar's equatorial mass were once part of those ridges that situation would indicate that the ridges may have once been smoother, and that in turn would indicate that the ridges could once have been the edges of an ocean. That possibility supports the idea that the planet was once covered by oceans.
c) If the rock ridges in the northern hemisphere of Mars were smooth at one time, some the planet's mass was once closer to the equator.
This does not make sense as the passage talks of the ridges becoming less smooth via mass shifting toward the equator. So if they were smooth at one point, the mass would at that point have been further from the equator, not closer.
d) In order for a planet to have oceans, a portion of the planet's mass must have been shifted towards the equator.
This cannot be inferred. This answer choice incorporates a clear logical flaw that involves taking an atypical case and generalizing from it.
e) There is general agreement in the scientific community that Mars does not have the right atmospheric conditions to support an ocean.
This answer choice can easily be eliminated as atmospheric conditions are not discussed and the passage does not include any information that can be used to infer what scientists believe about atmospheric conditions.

So the correct answer is b.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Tue Aug 04, 2015 2:51 am
I agree with Murrah.
The contention is that ocean edges are not "hilly" as seen on the ridges in the northern hemisphere.
These ridges are likely to be the mass deposited at the equator.

If it can be proved that the said mass at the equator are actually part of the ridges in the North,
we can reasonably assume the space was a pre-exisiting ocean.

I think that needed inference is provided in B.
Join the discussion

by yolo » Fri Apr 07, 2017 4:05 am
a)'oceans did not exist on the planet' this is the opposite of what the author wants to say although it maybe a lucrative answer choice
c)In this option there is no description of the fact 'that ocean existed once on the planet' which is a part of the main conclusion.
d)'a portion of the planet's mass 'must' have been shifted' this an exaggeration of the line by using 'must' which is not permissible for main point questions.
e)It is simply an out of scope answer.

Correct choice therefore is b) my friend...yolo
Join the discussion