Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Very Cool: this predicts your chances of getting accepted!

Share tips as you apply, write essays, interview...
Expert replies
by mafcMOTK » Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:21 pm
I just came across this. Very popular on the law school forums is the excel spreadsheet that allows you to put your info into this template and it show you your chances of admission at top programs. It looks like the same company made one for mba's and it is in its beta form. you can check this out at mbapredictor.com
Join the discussion
Source: — The Application Process |

by Sheriff » Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:27 am
WOW, nice! very scientific. Thanks for the link.
Join the discussion

by sunman » Wed Apr 04, 2012 3:24 am
I just looked at that. It's fun to play with, but just about worthless. MBA admissions are much more holistic than simple number crunching.

How do you judge your work experience from 0-5? Can you even assign it a numerical value? Furthermore, it doesn't take into account your essays, your cultural background or anything of the sort.

It tells me I have a 61% chance at Stanford GSB. Yeah, that figure would be more accurate if it said I had a 91% chance of getting dinged and a 9% chance of getting waitlisted.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has" - Margaret Mead
Join the discussion

by adpgh0128 » Wed Apr 04, 2012 8:31 am
Unfortunately I've used this tool a few times, and only discouraged myself. I don't know that you can really assign a number value to your educational institution or work experience. Each admissions office will have its own view of your record, and own rating of your experiences.

Also, judging by the comparisons it gives you based on your GPA and GMAT in relation to the schools listed, the tool itself is outdated. Most of the acceptance rates have not been updated, possibly since last year but maybe even earlier.

I wouldn't put too much stake in it.
Join the discussion

by tariqal » Wed Apr 04, 2012 8:08 pm
Sorry to be blunt, but not only is that a waste of your time, it may also dangerously implant baseless biases or deceptive preconceived notions into your head.

There's too much of a qualitative aspect of one's application that cannot be captured in a numerical grading system.

Until tools like this are proven to have a successful track record of assessing the quality of the different parts of applications, avoid it altogether.
Join the discussion