BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Veritas Question

Expert replies
by Fernando diaz » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:25 pm
Among developing nations, Latin American states are more likely than Asian nations to place power in the hands of communist-leaning chieftains
creating hostile environments for Western firms and discouraging aid groups from undertaking development initiatives, and prefer unconditional loans.

creating hostile environments for Western firms and discouraging aid groups from undertaking development initiatives, and prefer
creating hostile environments for Western firms, discouraging aid groups from undertaking development initiatives, and preferring
that create hostile environments for Western firms and discourage aid groups from undertaking development initiatives, and prefer
that create hostile environments for Western firms and discourage aid groups from undertaking development initiatives, preferring
that create hostile environments for Western firms, discouraging aid groups from undertaking development initiatives and preferring

Im doubtful about D because it uses that to modify chieftains, and I think it should be "who" instead.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by patanjali.purpose » Sat Aug 06, 2011 11:07 pm
that does not modify 'chieftians' here, instead, modifies the act of placing power...

I was confused btn C & D, but use of 'and prefer' is appropriate.

It could means '...Asian nations to place power in the hands of communist..and to prefer...' or ' Latin American states are more likely than Asian nations to place power ...and prefer..'.

Pls share OE

regards,
Patanjali
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:19 am
patanjali.purpose wrote:that does not modify 'chieftians' here, instead, modifies the act of placing power...
No. 'that' modifies chieftains only. Relative pronoun 'that' can be used for persons also.
Btw, if 'that' really refers to 'the act of placing power', first it is illogical and second the verb it follows should be singular(creates) and not create.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by Fernando diaz » Sun Aug 07, 2011 5:43 pm
Frankenstein wrote:
patanjali.purpose wrote:that does not modify 'chieftians' here, instead, modifies the act of placing power...
No. 'that' modifies chieftains only. Relative pronoun 'that' can be used for persons also.
Btw, if 'that' really refers to 'the act of placing power', first it is illogical and second the verb it follows should be singular(creates) and not create.
Mmm as far as I know the GMAT says that "that" cannot be used to refer to people. Can an expert corroborate that??
Join the discussion

by sunnyjohn » Sun Aug 07, 2011 8:51 pm
Join the discussion


by Frankenstein » Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:47 am
Fernando diaz wrote: Mmm as far as I know the GMAT says that "that" cannot be used to refer to people. Can an expert corroborate that??
Hi,
I think you are right. Generally, 'that' can also be used to refer to people. But, MGMAT says there is a question in OG 10, in which usage of 'that' to refer to people is an error. So, GMAT doesn't accept 'that' to refer to people. But, in this question we have no other option and let's hope 'who' will be used in a real GMAT question.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by abhizone » Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:55 am
IMHO, B is the correct answer.

First, I absolutely agree that 'that' must not be used for people and that 'who' is the appropriate choice. This leaves us with A and B.

Now A has a clear parallelism error as is uses 'prefer' when it should be 'preferring' and it also contains an extraneous and. The sentence only needs one 'and' before 'preferring'.
Join the discussion

by naveen451 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 9:23 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

by force5 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:54 pm
Fernando have you checked the question again? nothing seems to be correct here.
Join the discussion

by jonathan123456 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:30 pm
Fernando diaz wrote:Among developing nations, Latin American states are more likely than Asian nations to place power in the hands of communist-leaning chieftains
creating hostile environments for Western firms and discouraging aid groups from undertaking development initiatives, and prefer unconditional loans.

creating hostile environments for Western firms and discouraging aid groups from undertaking development initiatives, and prefer
creating hostile environments for Western firms, discouraging aid groups from undertaking development initiatives, and preferring
that create hostile environments for Western firms and discourage aid groups from undertaking development initiatives, and prefer
that create hostile environments for Western firms and discourage aid groups from undertaking development initiatives, preferring
that create hostile environments for Western firms, discouraging aid groups from undertaking development initiatives and preferring

Im doubtful about D because it uses that to modify chieftains, and I think it should be "who" instead.
WHats wrong with B. We should have a modifier which modifies "act of placing power" and not chieftans.
B does it and is also good with parallelism.
Comments?
Join the discussion

by Fernando diaz » Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:37 pm
I agree with both of you that the answer should be B but still I want an expert opinion.. I choose that and i got it wrong.
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:34 pm
jonathan123456 wrote: WHats wrong with B. We should have a modifier which modifies "act of placing power" and not chieftans.
B does it and is also good with parallelism.
Comments?
Hi,
How is "act of placing power' modified in B? I don't think so. Why should prefer be parallel to create and discourage?
create and discourage are the things these chieftains are doing. So, they should be parallel. 'preferring' is not something they are doing and hence does not need to be parallel. preferring unconditional loans is modifying the previous clause and it states the result of the preceding clause.
D correctly uses modifiers but 'that' is a bit of concern in D.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1