BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Veritas Free Practice Test - Verbal #15

Expert replies
by tpz » Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:11 pm
Epidemiologist: In Brazil, schistosomiasis and malaria are the two most common infectious diseases. Over the past five years, schistosomiasis has been primarily responsible for the overall increase in infectious disease cases. Therefore it is likely that there were more cases of schistosomiasis than malaria five years ago.

Which of the following most strengthens the argument above?

ANSWER: Over the past five years, the percentage of infectious disease cases caused by schistosomiasis has remained unchanged, but the percentage of cases caused by malaria has increased substantially.

How does that answer strengthen the argument? The explanation Veritas gave really didn't make sense to me. Thank you!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by David@GMATPrepNow » Wed Jul 23, 2014 2:08 pm
Wow, that answer takes a bit of work to get to, but it is correct. One way to get to the right answer is to identify the incorrect ones, as follows:

B. Trends in infectious disease data tend to persist for decades, unless there is a major breakthrough in treatment regimens.

Incorrect. We don't know if there has been a major breakthrough in treatment regimens on either malaria or schistosomiasis in the past five years. The passage does not give us any context with respect to what went on before five years ago. It is possible that there were more cases of malaria than schistosomiasis at that time, but some breakthrough in the treatment regimen for malaria led to a decline in its cases.

C. Five years ago, many more people died from schistosomiasis than died from malaria.

Incorrect. The number of people who died is irrelevant to the number of infection cases, since the passage does not address which disease is more likely to cause death, or has a better treatment regimen. It is possible that schistosomiasis had fewer cases five years ago, but is much more likely to cause death because it is a more "nasty" disease.

D. Over the past five years, the percentage of infectious disease cases caused by malaria was not significantly greater than the percentage of cases caused by schistosomiasis.

Incorrect. This answer weakens the argument. It suggests that the percentage of infection cases caused by malaria was slightly ("not significantly") greater than those caused by schistosomiasis.

E. Over the past five years, the percentage of infectious disease cases caused by diseases other than malaria and schistosomiasis did not increase substantially.

Incorrect. This answer does not strengthen the argument. It says that the percentage of infection cases caused by other diseases has essentially remained the same over the past five years, and does not address whether there were more cases of malaria or schistosomiasis five years ago.

Okay, then why is answer A correct? This is really a math question disguised as a Critical Reasoning question - which is by far the hardest type of question on the GMAT).

A. Over the past five years, the percentage of infectious disease cases caused by schistosomiasis has remained unchanged, but the percentage of cases caused by malaria has increased substantially.

Correct. If most of the increase in cases is due to schistosomiasis, but the percentage of schistosomiasis in the total cases has not changed, then most of the cases five years ago were also due to schistosomiasis. This strengthens the argument.
Join the discussion