BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Veritas Free CAT Results and Study Strategy

Expert replies
by OGMATTERS » Sat Aug 22, 2009 12:28 pm
How reliable are they? I just took the free CAT version and scored miserably Q-40, V-24, T-550. Are Veritas exams scoring mechanism similar to Kaplan's? I ask this because my combined score in the two are the same. I also want to add that I am studying quite a bit and have taken at least one exam each day this past week (some were on paper so I did not report those score in my signature; these scores range from 630-670). I think that fatigue is also a factor since the verbal/comprehensive scores in my last few CATS have been negative.

There really is a reason behind my madness. And my practice exams serves two purposes: to build stamina and to expose me to as many different questions as possible so I can build a test bank for a detailed analysis of my mistakes. I rush through a exam without checking my answers and pick the first one that appears correct to me. This saves quite a bit of time and I can usually shave 10-15 minutes each section. My thought process about this is: why waste time checking an answer I did correctly? I am only interested in reviewing the questions that I miss. The one bad thing about this approach is that I cannot get an accurate score to assess my skill level. Is this a smart thing for me to to do?

I am asking this because I am currently capable of scoring between 600-650 range. Under actual exam conditions, I believe that I can improve on this score by reviewing my answers and writing out all of my work to help avoid unnecessary errors.

If anyone has tried this approach, please let me know if it worked for you or what you would do the same or differently.
Please use the underline and spoiler buttons when posting SC questions.
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

by DanaJ » Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:36 am
I once took the Veritas free test and scored 700. The very next day, I took GMATprep 1 and had the exact same score. There are no reports of Veritas being too hard, as far as I can tell... Maybe you were just having a bad day...

Practice CATs are supposed to mimic test day conditions, so I'm not sure if rushing through is the best approach. Maybe you'll get so used to this that you'll rush through the real thing too and lose valuable points, with the only "upside" that you're going home earlier...

Picking the first answer that seems correct does make logical sense up to a point, with the extra time on your hands a valuable asset. However, in my experience, GMAT questions are written in such a way that the wrong answer choices are the exact wrong ones that you're likely to get. If the answer is 3, they probably won't post an option of 3000, for instance, but use 2, 4 or 5, which are pretty close. Remember, calculations CAN go wrong!

IMHO: save your practice tests. Doing one practice test per day is not your best bet for improvement; actually, I think you just might be wasting valuable resources. Think of it this way: yes, you review the questions you got wrong, and say you got 10 verbal wrong, with 3 CR, 4 SC and 3 RC. These wrong questions are spread across a wide spectrum of topics/skills tested, so you're only working through a small bit for each section at a time. However, if you work on CR for a day on say Weaken questions, that type is much more likely to stick to your head. Same goes for quant: you'll be reviewing number properties, statistics and geometry in the same go. Working on so many at a time will not help you understand the underlying principles! That's what books are for (i.e. Kaplan, MGMAT) and NOT practice tests.
Join the discussion