BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Verbal Review 18: Industry analysts said that

Expert replies
by NandishSS » Thu Oct 26, 2017 6:17 am
Industry analysts said that the recent rise in fuel prices may be an early signal of the possibility of gasoline and heating oil prices staying higher than usually through the end of the year.

A. of the possibility of gasoline and heating oil prices staying higher than usually through
B. of the possibility that gasoline and heating oil prices could stay higher than usual throughout
C. of prices of gasoline and heating oil possibly staying higher than usually through
D. that prices of gasoline and heating oil could stay higher than they usually are throughout
E. that prices of gasoline and heating oil will stay higher than usual through

OA: E

In A & B

of the possibility of gasoline and heating oil prices & of the possibility that gasoline and heating oil prices this doesn't make sense.

In E Why will is correct? Why not would/could?

Pls let me know the POE

Thanks
Nandish
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ErikaPrepScholar » Fri Oct 27, 2017 5:51 am
Hey NandishSS,

The big issue with A and B is redundancy: on the GMAT, we want to say things in as few words as possible, so we never want to repeat something we already know.

The non-underlined portion of the sentence says that the rise in fuel prices "may" be a signal. So before we get to the underlined portion, we've already established that what we're talking about isn't totally certain. A and B add "of the possibility", which is redundant - we already know that it's only a possibility from the word "may". This is also why we don't need "could" - it conveys the same uncertainty as "may".
Image

Erika John - Content Manager/Lead Instructor
https://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/

Get tutoring from me or another PrepScholar GMAT expert: https://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/tutoring/

Learn about our exclusive savings for BTG members (up to 25% off) and our 5 day free trial

Check out our PrepScholar GMAT YouTube channel, and read our expert guides on the PrepScholar GMAT blog
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Oct 27, 2017 11:13 am
NandishSS wrote:In E Why will is correct? Why not would/could?
E: The recent rise in fuel prices may be an early signal that prices of gasoline and heating oil will stay higher than usual through the end of the year.
Here, the usage of may conveys that the prediction in blue is not a sure thing but only something that COULD happen.
Since the usage of may on its own indicates that the prediction is something that COULD happen, it would be redundant to replace will with could.
Redundant: X may be a signal that Y could happen.
Correct: X may be a signal that Y will happen.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

Re:

by gui_guimaraes » Sat Jun 27, 2020 7:48 am
GMATGuruNY wrote: ↑
Fri Oct 27, 2017 11:13 am
bandits wrote:In E Why will is correct? Why not would/could?
E: The recent rise in fuel prices may be an early signal that prices of gasoline and heating oil will stay higher than usual through the end of the year.
Here, the usage of may conveys that the prediction in blue is not a sure thing but only something that COULD happen.
Since the usage of may on its own indicates that the prediction is something that COULD happen, it would be redundant to replace will with could.
Redundant: X may be a signal that Y could happen.
Correct: X may be a signal that Y will happen.
@GMATGuruNY

Mitch, isn't the meaning of A, B, and C wrong? I mean the "Industry analysts said that the recent rise in fuel prices may be an early signal of the possibility/ of prices" seems wrong. There is no "signal of the possibility/ of prices"? Am I right? Also, what is the difference of meaning between THROUGH vs THROUGHOUT? Many tks!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1