BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

verb tense

Expert replies
by armaan700+ » Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:01 pm
Although the Supreme Court ruled as long ago as 1880 that Blacks could not be excluded outright from jury service, nearly a century of case-by-case adjudication has been necessary to develop and enforce the principle that all juries must be drawn from “a fair cross section of the community.”
(A) has been necessary to develop and enforce the principle that all juries must be
(B) was necessary for developing and enforcing the principle of all juries being
(C) was to be necessary in developing and enforcing the principle of all juries to be
(D) is necessary to develop and enforce the principle that all juries must be
(E) will be necessary for developing and enforcing the principle of all juries being

pls provide exp
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: verb tense

by madhur_ahuja » Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:54 pm
IMO A ....Since the principle has been already enforced and is in effect till today.

Although the Supreme Court ruled as long ago as 1880 that Blacks could not be excluded outright from jury service, nearly a century of case-by-case adjudication has been necessary to develop and enforce the principle that all juries must be drawn from “a fair cross section of the community.”

(A) has been necessary to develop and enforce the principle that all juries must be
(B) was necessary for developing and enforcing the principle of all juries being
(C) was to be necessary in developing and enforcing the principle of all juries to be
(D) is necessary to develop and enforce the principle that all juries must be
(E) will be necessary for developing and enforcing the principle of all juries being
Join the discussion

by Jar10 » Mon Apr 05, 2010 8:02 am
@madhur..i m a bit confused can u please explain me the reasoning behind ur answer
Although principal has been enforced and is in effect till date but case-by-case adjudication was necesary at that time so .............how come the answer not B..
B has a falw of using being.if we leave that can B be the answer..........please explain......
Join the discussion

by vivek1110 » Mon Apr 05, 2010 8:19 am
Although the Supreme Court ruled as long ago as 1880 that Blacks could not be excluded outright from jury service, nearly a century of case-by-case adjudication has been necessary to develop and enforce the principle that all juries must be drawn from "a fair cross section of the community."
(A) has been necessary to develop and enforce the principle that all juries must be
[Event which started in the past and is still in progress, HAS been is correct construction]
(B) was necessary for developing and enforcing the principle of all juries being
[Being is almost always wrong, also, WAS indicates that even has concluded in the past]
(C) was to be necessary in developing and enforcing the principle of all juries to be
[Same as above]
(D) is necessary to develop and enforce the principle that all juries must be
[IS necessary, implies that the adjudication should happen in the future, it's a recommendation - Eliminate]
(E) will be necessary for developing and enforcing the principle of all juries being
[again future tense used - Eliminate]
I hope this helps.
Is caught between a rock and a hard place!
Join the discussion

by Jar10 » Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:04 am
THanks vivek1110
But my question is "case-by-case adjudication WAS necessary" in 1980 but today the rule is in effect so why use has not was...............leave the OA aside...........just xplain why has insted of was i know option is wrong beacuse of being.............
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:18 am
"nearly a century of case-by-case adjudication" is signaled me to use present perfect tense.

So "has been" is appropriate.
Join the discussion

by prinit » Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:30 am
armaan700+ wrote:Although the Supreme Court ruled as long ago as 1880 that Blacks could not be excluded outright from jury service, nearly a century of case-by-case adjudication has been necessary to develop and enforce the principle that all juries must be drawn from �a fair cross section of the community.�
(A) has been necessary to develop and enforce the principle that all juries must be
(B) was necessary for developing and enforcing the principle of all juries being
(C) was to be necessary in developing and enforcing the principle of all juries to be
(D) is necessary to develop and enforce the principle that all juries must be
(E) will be necessary for developing and enforcing the principle of all juries being

pls provide exp

My pick is A.
B and E are wrong - 'being' (almost and always wrong)
C is wrong for awkward and wrong construction was to be
Now between A and D, A wins. It is ongoing action so A fits the bill.
I'm here to BTG :)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1