Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

$ value

Expert replies
by aj5105 » Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:46 am
The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government’s huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines?

(A) The government has made little attempt to reduce the budget deficit.

(B) The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth.

(C) The value of the dollar declined several times in the year prior to the recent prediction of slower economic growth.

(D) Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused declines in the dollar’s value.

(E) When there is a large budget deficit, other events in addition to predictions of slower economic growth sometimes trigger declines in currency value.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by tohellandback » Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:54 am
IMO D:
author says it was not the prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year but the government’s huge budget deficit that triggered the decline in the value of the dollar.

D clearly says that even without a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused declines in the dollar’s value.
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by turbo jet » Thu Jun 11, 2009 4:57 am
IMO: D
Life is Tom; I am Jerry ;)
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Thu Jun 11, 2009 5:18 am
D clearly weakens the argument.
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:12 am
OA (D)
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:41 pm
I arrived at D as well; however, I was considering E as a candidate until I realized that D was a much stronger answer. Can someone point out why E is clearly not a viable response?
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by turbo jet » Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:00 pm
Hi Dommu,

To anser your query on why E is eliminated.

We need to focus on the author's conclusion in this argument.
Conclusion: Currency value is declining

Next what are my premises:
a. Slow eco growth
b. Large budget deficit

Which premise/evidence is the author strongly supporting?
Large budget deficit

Thus E gets rejected on 2 possible grounds:

1. E is assuming that large budget deficit has already occurred.
Clue: "When there is a large budget deficit" So E is not weakening the stronger evidence of the author. It is instead assuming it to be true.

2. In the second clause in the sentence , E is undermining the first premise but not too strongly. Clue: Because the phrase "Sometimes " is used.


So on either/ both of the above grounds, E gets eliminated


Hope this helps!!!!

Cheers
TJ
:)
Life is Tom; I am Jerry ;)
Join the discussion

by mason77 » Sun May 15, 2016 2:45 pm
Also option D
Join the discussion