BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Value of K

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:42 pm
The question "Is 1/k > 0" can be rewritten as "is k positive?" since the only way for 1/k to be greater than 0 is for k to be positive.

(1) If 1/(k-1) is positive, then k-1 is positive: 0<k-1
Add 1 to both sides: 1<k
k is definitely positive
SUFF

(2) If 1/(k+1) is positive, then k+1 is positive: 0<k+1
Subtract 1 from both sides: -1<k
k can be either positive or negative.
INSUFF

The answer is A
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by welcome » Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:25 pm
same as Brent , I'll go for A. what is OA.
Shubham.
590 >> 630 >> 640 >> 610 >> 600 >> 640 >> 590 >> 640 >> 590 >> 590
Join the discussion

Re: Value of K

by x2suresh » Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:57 pm
Agree with Brent A.
Join the discussion

by fighting_cax » Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:35 pm
Thanks Brent - your explanation is very clear.
Join the discussion

by Uri » Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:57 pm
Brent Hanneson wrote: (2) If 1/(k+1) is positive, then k+1 is positive: 0<k+1
Subtract 1 from both sides: -1<k
k can be either positive or negative.
INSUFF

The answer is A

From (2), we know that k>-1. And we are told explicitly that k is not 0, 1 or -1. Thus combining this two, k>1. Hence (2) should also be sufficient.

Please rectify me if I have made any mistake.
Join the discussion

by rolrol19 » Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:00 pm
Agree with Uri!
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:39 pm
From (2), we know that k>-1. And we are told explicitly that k is not 0, 1 or -1. Thus combining this two, k>1. Hence (2) should also be sufficient.

Please rectify me if I have made any mistake
Agree with Uri!
A common mistake is to assume k is an integer. The problem states k is not 0,1 or -1 so it can be anything else(integer or fraction)


Stmt II

1/k+1 > 0

k= - 1/2 still 1/k+1 > 0 and 1/k is not greater than 0



Hope this helps!

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by Uri » Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:41 pm
thanks, cramya! understood my mistake
Join the discussion