BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Vague laws

Expert replies
by Amadalia » Wed Apr 09, 2014 8:06 am
Vague laws set vague limits on people's freedom, which makes it impossible for them to know for certain whether their actions are legal. Thus, under vague laws , pple cannot feel secure.

Conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?
(a) Pple can feel secure only if they know for certain that their actions are legal
(b) If pple do not know for certain whether their actions are legal, they might not feel secure
(c) If pple know for certain that their actions are legal, they can feel secure
(d) Pple can feel secure if they are governed by laws that are not vague
(e) Only pple who feel secure can know for certain whether their actions are legal


I can't SEE the difference between A and C for me the are the same!!!
Many thanks in advance!!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ajaysingh24 » Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:07 am
Amadalia wrote:Vague laws set vague limits on people's freedom, which makes it impossible for them to know for certain whether their actions are legal. Thus, under vague laws , pple cannot feel secure.

Conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?
(a) Pple can feel secure only if they know for certain that their actions are legal
(b) If pple do not know for certain whether their actions are legal, they might not feel secure
(c) If pple know for certain that their actions are legal, they can feel secure
(d) Pple can feel secure if they are governed by laws that are not vague
(e) Only pple who feel secure can know for certain whether their actions are legal


I can't SEE the difference between A and C for me the are the same!!!
Many thanks in advance!!!
Is Ans (b) If pple do not know for certain whether their actions are legal, they might not feel secure

I think the difference in (a) and (C) is of logic
(c) If pple know for certain that their actions are legal, they can feel secure
can means ---people cannot feel secure , if people do not know for certain that their action are legal .
but (a) means -- Pple can feel secure only if they know for certain that their actions are legal .
both are logically different
Join the discussion

by sundeepahuja27 » Thu Apr 10, 2014 11:57 pm
Amadalia wrote:Vague laws set vague limits on people's freedom, which makes it impossible for them to know for certain whether their actions are legal. Thus, under vague laws , pple cannot feel secure.

Conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?
(a) Pple can feel secure only if they know for certain that their actions are legal
(b) If pple do not know for certain whether their actions are legal, they might not feel secure
(c) If pple know for certain that their actions are legal, they can feel secure
(d) Pple can feel secure if they are governed by laws that are not vague
(e) Only pple who feel secure can know for certain whether their actions are legal


I can't SEE the difference between A and C for me the are the same!!!
Many thanks in advance!!!
Hi Amadalia,

I would tackle this question just based on a logical flow or analogy. Since the options are similar in meaning, it is better to hit the analogy in construction.

You can take it in this way-
A leads to B.(premise)
B leads to C.(assumption or a link)
hence, A leads to C. (conclusion)
If you see option (b); You can reconstruct the question as-
Vague Laws= impossible for people to know for certain whether their actions are legal.
If people do not know for certain => might not feel secure.
hence, vague laws => people cannot feel secure.

The options A and C, though have meanings similar, are not analogous to the construction of the question.
Join the discussion

by Amadalia » Fri Apr 11, 2014 4:04 am
THANKS A LOT Sundeepahuja !!!!
Join the discussion

by sinsofgmat » Sat Apr 12, 2014 5:08 am
Amadalia wrote:THANKS A LOT Sundeepahuja !!!!
Hi,

May i know the source of the question.
Join the discussion

by Amadalia » Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:11 am
It's a from powerscore bible
an old LSAT question


How do you find it? nice one right??
Join the discussion