BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

vacation

Expert replies
by ketkoag » Wed May 06, 2009 10:22 am
During a 10-week summer vacation, was the average (arithmetic mean) number of
books that Carolyn read per week greater than the average number of books that Jacob
read per week?
(1) Twice the average number of books that Carolyn read per week was greater
than 5 less than twice the average number of books that Jacob read per week.
(2) During the last 5 weeks of the vacation, Carolyn read a total of 3 books more
than Jacob.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: vacation

by Vemuri » Thu May 07, 2009 4:01 am
IMO E.

Let, Avg # of books Carolyn read/week = C
Avg # of books Jacob read/week = J

Stmt 1: 2C > 2J -5 ==> 2C + 5 > 2J ==> C + 2.5 > J
From this we cannot say for sure that the avg # of books Carolyn read/week is greater than the avg # of books Jacob read/week. So, insufficient.

Stmt 2: During the last 5 weeks, Carolyn ready 3 more books than Jacob. This info is definitely not enough to answer because we do not know how many books per week they both read in the first 5 weeks.

Combining both the statements also does not help determine if Carolyn read more books/week.
Join the discussion

Re: vacation

by ketkoag » Thu May 07, 2009 10:21 am
Vemuri wrote:IMO E.

Let, Avg # of books Carolyn read/week = C
Avg # of books Jacob read/week = J

Stmt 1: 2C > 2J -5 ==> 2C + 5 > 2J ==> C + 2.5 > J
From this we cannot say for sure that the avg # of books Carolyn read/week is greater than the avg # of books Jacob read/week. So, insufficient.

Stmt 2: During the last 5 weeks, Carolyn ready 3 more books than Jacob. This info is definitely not enough to answer because we do not know how many books per week they both read in the first 5 weeks.

Combining both the statements also does not help determine if Carolyn read more books/week.
I also marked E, but the OA given is A i don't think that OA is correct coz i checked it many times and i don't feel that i am missing something.. after some more posts i think i'll be sure about the OA!!
Join the discussion