BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Use of evidence and pronoun

Expert replies
by nikhilgupta » Tue Jan 10, 2012 10:41 pm
A "calendar stick" carved centuries ago by the Winnebago tribe may provide the first evidence that the North American Indians have developed advanced full-year calendars basing them on systematic astronomical observation.(A) that the North American Indians have developed advanced full-year calendars basing them

(B) of the North American Indians who have developed advanced full-year calendars and based them

(C) of the development of advanced full-year calendars by North American Indians, basing them

(D) of the North American Indians and their development of advanced full-year calendars based

(E) that the North American Indians developed advanced full-year calendars based


OA E
I have 2 questions
1) Should evidence be followed by 'of'
2)Is usage of 'them' incorrect in A,B and C
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by sam2304 » Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:22 am
Usage of evidence of and evidence that depends on the context.
evidence of - supports something
evidence that - proves something. Hope you get that.

A - them - them can refer to north american indians or calendars - wrong, no clear referent. Basing them is redundant, them here referring to the calendars again is unnecessary.
B - The calendar stick provide evidence of North America Indians - Totally absurd - changes the meaning as if the calendar stick is the evidence for the existence of North American Indians
C - them - same problem as in A - no clear referrant
D - same problem as in B - Calender stick as the evidence for two things X (North American Indians) and Y (their development of calendars) - wrong as it changes the meaning

E is the only choice which is error free :)

IMO E.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:06 am
First of all I would request you to underline the relevant parts under study. As I can infer from B,C,D and E - "on systematic astronomical observation" cannot be in underline portion. So please check before posting to avoid confusion.

Now coming to you doubt:
nikhilgupta wrote:
1) Should evidence be followed by 'of'
This is dependent what you want to convey.

Here B,C and D ( I am just approaching this problem from your perspective, there are other error in B,C and D, I am ignoring that), is wrong because we are not sure what the prepositional modifier : "of the development of .... " is modifying. IS it an adverb modifier for the verb "provide" or is it a noun modifier of the noun - "evidence" ?

As per the meaning of the sentence : X provided the first evidence Y.

Please note here : X is the subject and Y completes the sentence by telling us what is the first evidence.
X did not only provided the "first evidence" but it provided the "first evidence of something" - the technical name for this is called object complement. So we need a noun clause here and "that...." exactly is suitable here.

When you are using evidence as a verb, you can use a prepositional phrase (by, of, for, with... ) to modify "evidence" -

So we can go for A and E.
nikhilgupta wrote:
2)Is usage of 'them' incorrect in A,B and C
There are two plural noun here : From meaning point , yes "them " do refer to "calendars". This is not a split here anyway.
I think there is a meaning issue in this : the first one is more logical from what I can get from the meaning wants to convey.

1. I created a rock sculpture based on my past experience.
2. I created a rock sculpture and based them on my past experience.
3. I created a rock sculpture, basing them on my past experience.

2 and 3 are quiet different and illogical in meaning from 1.

Hope this helps !!
Please press the "thank" button, if you find my post helpful
Join the discussion

by nikhilgupta » Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:47 am
Thank you guys, BTW I cannot find the "thank" button
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:53 am
sam2304 wrote:Usage of evidence of and evidence that depends on the context.
evidence of - supports something
evidence that - proves something. Hope you get that.

IMO E.
Hii sam,

After long, I got the privilege to comment on your post. Great explanation. But I have a doubt here.

I could not realize the difference between supporting something and proving something - We prove a theory X to support the fact that theory X exists. Isn't it ?

Thanks !!
Join the discussion

by sam2304 » Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:17 am
Hey avik

Welcome back after the new year break. :D

evidence of
e.g His trembling was evidence of his fear - Here we support/indicate something

evidence that
e.g the above sentence is to prove something or arrive at a conclusion
A calendar stick is the evidence that North American Indians used advanced full year calendars

Hope that makes sense and i am right. :) Maybe i used inappropriate words.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:51 am
sam2304 wrote:Hey avik

Welcome back after the new year break. :D

evidence of
e.g His trembling was evidence of his fear - Here we support/indicate something

evidence that
e.g the above sentence is to prove something or arrive at a conclusion
A calendar stick is the evidence that North American Indians used advanced full year calendars

Hope that makes sense and i am right. :) Maybe i used inappropriate words.
Ok...I got the structural difference now ( apart from the one i mentioned above)

If you want to modify the noun "evidence" with a clause : use "that".

A calendar stick is the evidence that North American Indians used advanced full year calendars
The broken window was evidence that a burglary had taken place.

If its just a noun phrase use a preposition as desired :

His trembling was evidence of his fear.
Scientists weigh the evidence for and against a hypothesis.

The meaning difference mentioned by you is quiet subtle. If you can understand the difference, go for it.
Join the discussion