I am having a little trouble understanding your question.

That said, I can't imagine a scenario in which the word "fact" would be wrong because of a usage issue.

Let me know if you have more questions,

Josh

Thanks for your reply Josh,

Here is the example from 1000 SC.

A discussion of our nations foreign policy must begin with the fact of there being an independent Western Europe which now thinks of itself in trans-nationalist terms.

A. A discussion of our nations foreign policy must begin with the fact of there being
B. Beginning any discussion of our nations foreign policy must be the fact of there being
C. Any discussion of our nations foreign policy must begin with the fact that there is
D. Any discussion of our nations foreign policy must begin by acknowledging the existence of
E. To begin discussing our nations foreign policy thee must be an acknowledgment of the fact that

here what is wrong with C? C has a word 'fact' in it.

josh@knewton wrote:I am having a little trouble understanding your question.

That said, I can't imagine a scenario in which the word "fact" would be wrong because of a usage issue.

Let me know if you have more questions,

Josh

I think, all they mean is that it's usually wordy when compared to other answer choices. Here, the correct answer is D. "acknowledging the existence of" just sounds more elegant than "with the fact that there is."

Also, C, changes the meaning I think. How do you begin something with a fact? You could begin by acknowledging a fact, or understanding a fact, or stating a fact. But not fact by itself.


But, otherwise you're allowed to use fact. Here's a sentence that uses fact correctly: "The fact that he overslept for work is not a good reason to fire him."