BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Usage of They

Expert replies
by gmatjeet » Sun Jul 24, 2011 9:57 am
While bear markets certainly hurt institutional investors, they are potentially devastating for individual investors, whose nest eggs - in many cases representing the sole source of retirement funds - can plummet or even vanish entirely.

a. they are potentially devastating for individual investors, whose
b. they can potentially devastate individual investors in that their
c. for individual investors they are potentially devastating, because their
d. for individual investors, it is potentially devastating in that their
e. it can potentially devastate individual investors, whose

OA: A

Query: In A, "They" is used. As per the explanation, "They" clearly refers to Bear Markets.
- But just before "They", there are two plural nouns. How to ensure that in such cases, we can clearly identify whether or not pronoun is creating ambiguity.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by mj78ind » Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:07 am
I think "they" is not an issue here, only choice A fits. All others have different kind of errors. They does not follow a rule like which (anything preceding "which" is referred to by which) hence in this context does not seem ambiguous to me.[/quote]
Call me 1 - (412) 897 6727 (US) or leave a msg on BTG for GMAT advise / questions.
If you like the solution, check out my debrief at and leave a comment:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/760-done-dea ... 66740.html
Join the discussion

by gmatjeet » Sun Jul 24, 2011 11:32 am
Thanks. I know A fits best.

My query is "In such kind of sentences, how do we decide if the usage of "They" is creating ambiguity or not? "

If you see, "They" can refer to both "Bear Markets" as well as "Investors". How to decide that "They" is referring to "Bear Markets"?
Join the discussion

by Chaitanya_1986 » Sun Jul 24, 2011 1:20 pm
While bear markets certainly hurt institutional investors, they are potentially devastating for individual investors, whose nest eggs - in many cases representing the sole source of retirement funds - can plummet or even vanish entirely.

a. they are potentially devastating for individual investors, whose
b. they can potentially devastate individual investors in that their
c. for individual investors they are potentially devastating, because their
d. for individual investors, it is potentially devastating in that their
e. it can potentially devastate individual investors, whose

See, the funda here is:

They is in the subjective case...So, it will refer to the subject of the previous clause....i.e
Bear markets not the individual investors.....Whose refers to the individual investors....So A is correct....

B is wrong because of "in that their construction"

C has ambiguity reference of they

D is wrong because of it reference...

E is wrong because of it reference.....

Any doubts???
Join the discussion

by Buix0065 » Sun Jul 24, 2011 5:29 pm
A

To answer your question, I thought about that too, and to me "while" made me think that there should be a connection between the two thoughts. Institutional Investors could not be the subject of 'they' because 'while' sets up a comparison between the investors getting hurt and something else...
Join the discussion

by navami » Sun Jul 24, 2011 9:31 pm
A is the one!
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Sun Jul 24, 2011 9:47 pm
gmatjeet wrote:Thanks. I know A fits best.

My query is "In such kind of sentences, how do we decide if the usage of "They" is creating ambiguity or not? "

If you see, "They" can refer to both "Bear Markets" as well as "Investors". How to decide that "They" is referring to "Bear Markets"?
You should only worry about the pronoun that refers to the subject of the preceding dependent clause.
Bear markets is the subject while individual investors is an object. If at all the sentence intends to modify object, the next will be a modifier sentence and not a complete sentence. As you can see that the first part is a dependent clause, and an independent sentence must follow after comma, they can only modify the main subject Bear markets.

Hope that's clear.
Smack is Back ...
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1