BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Usage of Participles

Expert replies
by karthikpandian19 » Tue May 08, 2012 12:32 am
A large rise in the number of housing starts in the coming year should boost new construction dollars by several billion dollars, making the construction industry's economic health much more robust than five years ago.
(A) making the construction industry's economic health much more robust than five years ago
(B) and make the construction industry's economic health much more robust than five years ago
(C) making the construction industry's economic health much more robust than it was five years ago
(D) to make the construction industry's economic health much more robust than five years ago
(E) in making the construction industry's economic health much more robust than it as five years ago
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue May 08, 2012 7:11 am
We need the wording "it was" to make the comparison valid: the economic health today vs. the economic health five years ago. Without "it was", the comparison is the economic health today vs. "five years ago" with no context. We can eliminate A, B, and D.

E uses the preposition "in" which we don't need.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Tue May 08, 2012 10:05 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:A large rise in the number of housing starts in the coming year should boost new construction dollars by several billion dollars, making the construction industry's economic health much more robust than five years ago.
(A) making the construction industry's economic health much more robust than five years ago Wrong comparison
(B) and make the construction industry's economic health much more robust than five years ago
(C) making the construction industry's economic health much more robust than it was five years ago
(D) to make the construction industry's economic health much more robust than five years ago
(E) in making the construction industry's economic health much more robust than it as five years ago
Join the discussion

by hey_thr67 » Tue May 08, 2012 1:45 pm
Answer should be C,

making in C tells about the result when construction dollar increases, so no need to change the construction: "making the construction... ".

Mistakes in rest others has been mentioned above.
Join the discussion

by ice_rush » Tue May 08, 2012 5:29 pm
Hi Bill,

Would (B) be a contender if it has correct comparison? ...and make the construction industry's economic health much more robust than it was five years ago or does this sentence require comma + verbing?



Thanks!
Join the discussion

by confuse mind » Tue May 08, 2012 6:07 pm
ice_rush wrote:Hi Bill,

Would (B) be a contender if it has correct comparison? ...and make the construction industry's economic health much more robust than it was five years ago or does this sentence require comma + verbing?



Thanks!



It needs , + verb + ing because the participle is the result!
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue May 08, 2012 6:19 pm
ice_rush wrote:Hi Bill,

Would (B) be a contender if it has correct comparison? ...and make the construction industry's economic health much more robust than it was five years ago or does this sentence require comma + verbing?



Thanks!
If you remove the comma, that could work:

A large rise in the number of housing starts in the coming year should boost new construction dollars by several billion dollars and make the construction industry's economic health much more robust than bit was five years ago.

We have parallel form: "a large rise should boost...and make..."

It is wordier and a bit more awkward, though, so I would still prefer B.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by ice_rush » Tue May 08, 2012 7:11 pm
Hi Bill,

Just making sure i understood you... did you say you'd prefer (B) over (C) even though (B) is a little wordier?



Thanks!
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue May 08, 2012 10:45 pm
Ah, no that was a typo. Sorry! I'd still go with C for being more direct.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Wed May 09, 2012 10:31 pm
OA is C
Join the discussion

by ihatemaths » Thu May 10, 2012 6:18 am
@Bill why cant B be correct i was stuck btw B and C chose B because "and" sounded great when the whole tense of the sentence was taken into account.
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Thu May 10, 2012 9:39 am
Whenever we use ", and" to link two clauses, we need a subject and a verb before and after the conjunction. B has a verb ("make"), but it does not have a subject.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by Spidy001 » Thu May 10, 2012 11:17 am
Bill,

in option D , other than the comparison error , is it correct to use infinitive?

is it ever ok to use infinitive as modifier or to be specific can we ever have comma + infinitive as modifier?

also in option E, why is in wrong? could you give some examples where ",in" as a modifier is acceptable.


Thanks in advance.

Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:We need the wording "it was" to make the comparison valid: the economic health today vs. the economic health five years ago. Without "it was", the comparison is the economic health today vs. "five years ago" with no context. We can eliminate A, B, and D.

E uses the preposition "in" which we don't need.
Join the discussion

by Spidy001 » Thu May 10, 2012 12:44 pm
options A,B,D are all wrong because of wrong comparisons between industry's economic health and five years ago.

Option E is wrong - it as five years ago - meaning health acts as five years ago .

Answer is C. (Correct comparisons)
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Thu May 10, 2012 9:13 pm
Spidy001 wrote:Bill,

in option D , other than the comparison error , is it correct to use infinitive?

is it ever ok to use infinitive as modifier or to be specific can we ever have comma + infinitive as modifier?

also in option E, why is in wrong? could you give some examples where ",in" as a modifier is acceptable.


Thanks in advance.
You can have an infinitive in a modifying phrase, but it's usually at the start of a sentence:

To lose weight, I lifted weights and counted calories.




"In" is a preposition. If we use it to start a prepositional phrase, we don't need to use a comma:

He spent a lot of time in the Dali exhibit.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion